arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1708.01425cs.CLcs.AI
收藏

论元推理理解任务:内隐保证的识别与重构

The Argument Reasoning Comprehension Task: Identification and Reconstruction of Implicit Warrants

Technische Universität Darmstadt(达姆施塔特工业大学);Bauhaus-Universität Weimar(魏玛包豪斯大学)

Ivan Habernal, Henning Wachsmuth, Iryna Gurevych, Benno Stein

摘要:

推理是自然语言论证的重要组成部分。为了理解一个论证,我们必须分析它的根据,这解释了为什么它的主张是从它的前提得出的。由于论证是高度语境化的,因此论据通常是预先假定的,并且是隐含的。因此,理解不仅需要语言理解和逻辑技巧,而且还依赖于常识。在本文中,我们开发了一种方法来重建权证系统。我们在一个可扩展的众包过程中将其操作化,从而产生了一个免费许可的数据集,并从新闻评论中获得了2k个真实论点的保证。在此基础上,我们提出了一个新的具有挑战性的任务,论点推理理解任务。给定一个有一个主张和一个前提的论点,目标是从两个选项中选择正确的隐含保证。这两个理由都是合理的,词汇上也很接近,但却导致了相互矛盾的说法。这项任务的解决方案将为自动重建权证迈出实质性的一步。然而,几个神经注意和语言模型的实验表明,目前的方法是不够的。

英文摘要:

Reasoning is a crucial part of natural language argumentation. To comprehend an argument, one must analyze its warrant, which explains why its claim follows from its premises. As arguments are highly contextualized, warrants are usually presupposed and left implicit. Thus, the comprehension does not only require language understanding and logic skills, but also depends on common sense. In this paper we develop a methodology for reconstructing warrants systematically. We operationalize it in a scalable crowdsourcing process, resulting in a freely licensed dataset with warrants for 2k authentic arguments from news comments. On this basis, we present a new challenging task, the argument reasoning comprehension task. Given an argument with a claim and a premise, the goal is to choose the correct implicit warrant from two options. Both warrants are plausible and lexically close, but lead to contradicting claims. A solution to this task will define a substantial step towards automatic warrant reconstruction. However, experiments with several neural attention and language models reveal that current approaches do not suffice.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑