arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1706.07571math.GRcs.NAmath-phmath.COmath.MPmath.NAmath.PR
收藏

Thompson组及相关组的数值研究

Numerical studies of Thompson's group F and related groups

Andrew Elvey Price, Anthony J Guttmann

AI总结:

本文研究了Thompson组及相关组的共增长级数,开发了多项式时间算法生成这些级数的项,并通过数值技术提取其渐进行为,给出了Thompson组F的共增长级数的改进下界,探讨了该组是否可 amenable 的问题。

摘要:

我们开发了多项式时间算法来生成群$\mathbb{Z}\wr \mathbb{Z}$、灯塔群、$(\mathbb{Z}\wr \mathbb{Z})\wr \mathbb{Z}$和Navas-Brin群$B$的共增长级数的项。我们还为Thompson组$F$的系数提供了改进的算法,生成了32项的共增长级数。我们开发了数值技术来提取这些各种共增长级数的渐进行为。我们利用方法\cite{HHR15}应用于扩展的级数,给出了Thompson组$F$的共增长级数增长速率的改进的严格下界。我们还通过展示该方法适用于任何局部有限图上的环路,将其推广。不幸的是,低于16的下界无助于确定amenability。再次针对Thompson组$F$,我们证明,如果该群是amenable的,那么渐进行为中不可能存在亚主导的指数项。然而,数值数据提供了这种项存在的强有力证据。这一观察表明了一条通往非amenable证明的潜在路径:如果能严格确定共增长序列的 universality class,它将很可能证明非amenable。我们估计$F$的共增长系数的渐进行为为$$c_n \sim c \cdot μ^n \cdot κ^{n^σ\log^δ{n}} \cdot n^g,$$其中$μ\approx 15$,$κ\approx 1/e$,$σ\approx 1/2$,$δ\approx 1/2$,且$g \approx -1$。增长常数$μ$必须为16才能满足amenability。这两种方法加上基于下界外推的第三种方法,支持了猜想\cite{ERvR15, HHR15},即该群不是amenable的。

英文摘要:

We have developed polynomial-time algorithms to generate terms of the cogrowth series for groups $\mathbb{Z}\wr \mathbb{Z},$ the lamplighter group, $(\mathbb{Z}\wr \mathbb{Z})\wr \mathbb{Z}$ and the Navas-Brin group $B.$ We have also given an improved algorithm for the coefficients of Thompson's group $F,$ giving 32 terms of the cogrowth series. We develop numerical techniques to extract the asymptotics of these various cogrowth series. We present improved rigorous lower bounds on the growth-rate of the cogrowth series for Thompson's group $F$ using the method from \cite{HHR15} applied to our extended series. We also generalise their method by showing that it applies to loops on any locally finite graph. Unfortunately, lower bounds less than 16 do not help in determining amenability. Again for Thompson's group $F$ we prove that, if the group is amenable, there cannot be a sub-dominant stretched exponential term in the asymptotics\footnote{ }. Yet the numerical data provides compelling evidence for the presence of such a term. This observation suggests a potential path to a proof of non-amenability: If the universality class of the cogrowth sequence can be determined rigorously, it will likely prove non-amenability. We estimate the asymptotics of the cogrowth coefficients of $F$ to be $$ c_n \sim c \cdot μ^n \cdot κ^{n^σ\log^δ{n}} \cdot n^g,$$ where $μ\approx 15,$ $κ\approx 1/e,$ $σ\approx 1/2,$ $δ\approx 1/2,$ and $g \approx -1.$ The growth constant $μ$ must be 16 for amenability. These two approaches, plus a third based on extrapolating lower bounds, support the conjecture \cite{ERvR15, HHR15} that the group is not amenable.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑