arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1704.08075astro-ph.GA
收藏

在发射中寻找阻尼Ly $α$星系25年的共识报告:在$z \gtrsim 2$上图解它们的金属度-光度关系

Consensus report on 25 years of searches for damped Ly$α$ galaxies in emission: Confirming their metallicity-luminosity relation at $z \gtrsim 2$

Jens-Kristian Krogager, Palle Møller, Johan P. U. Fynbo, Pasquier Noterdaeme

摘要:

从我们最近的X-射手运动的检测统计数据的摘要开始,我们回顾了主要的调查,空间和地面为基础,高红移阻尼的Ly $α$吸收剂(DLAs)的排放同行进行了第一次检测以来25年前。我们表明,所有调查的检测率精确地再现了一个简单的模型,其中的金属丰度和光度的星系与DLA遵循的关系的形式,${\rm M_{UV}} = -5 \times \left(\,[{\rm M/H}] + 0.3\, \right) - 20.8$,和DLA横截面遵循的关系的形式$σ_{DLA} \propto L^{0.8}$。具体地,我们的光谱活动由11个DLA组成,所述DLA基于它们的SiII $\lambda1526$的等效宽度被预选以具有高于[Si/H] >-1的金属丰度。在甚大望远镜上用X射线摄谱仪观察了这些目标,以寻找类星体周围的发射线。我们观察到64%(7/11)的高检出率,显著高于随机、HI选择的DLA样本的典型$\sim$ 10%。我们使用上述模型,模拟我们的调查的结果,连同一系列以前的调查:光谱叠加,直接成像(使用“双DLA”技术),长缝光谱,积分场光谱。根据我们的模型结果,我们能够协调所有结果。当观察单个目标的Ly $α$发射预测时,在模型和数据之间观察到一些张力。然而,物体与物体之间的差异很可能是由于基本比例关系的显著分散以及影响排放的尘埃量的不确定性。

英文摘要:

Starting from a summary of detection statistics of our recent X-shooter campaign, we review the major surveys, both space and ground based, for emission counterparts of high-redshift damped Ly$α$ absorbers (DLAs) carried out since the first detection 25 years ago. We show that the detection rates of all surveys are precisely reproduced by a simple model in which the metallicity and luminosity of the galaxy associated to the DLA follow a relation of the form, ${\rm M_{UV}} = -5 \times \left(\,[{\rm M/H}] + 0.3\, \right) - 20.8$, and the DLA cross-section follows a relation of the form $σ_{DLA} \propto L^{0.8}$. Specifically, our spectroscopic campaign consists of 11 DLAs preselected based on their equivalent width of SiII $\lambda1526$ to have a metallicity higher than [Si/H] > -1. The targets have been observed with the X-shooter spectrograph at the Very Large Telescope to search for emission lines around the quasars. We observe a high detection rate of 64% (7/11), significantly higher than the typical $\sim$10% for random, HI-selected DLA samples. We use the aforementioned model, to simulate the results of our survey together with a range of previous surveys: spectral stacking, direct imaging (using the `double DLA' technique), long-slit spectroscopy, and integral field spectroscopy. Based on our model results, we are able to reconcile all results. Some tension is observed between model and data when looking at predictions of Ly$α$ emission for individual targets. However, the object to object variations are most likely a result of the significant scatter in the underlying scaling relations as well as uncertainties in the amount of dust which affects the emission.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑