arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1702.04643astro-ph.GAastro-ph.IM
收藏

活动星系核的微变:不同统计方法的研究- I。观测分析

Microvariability in AGNs: study of different statistical methods - I. Observational analysis

L. Zibecchi, I. Andruchow, S. A. Cellone, D. D. Carpintero, G. E. Romero, J. A. Combi

摘要:

我们提出了目前在文献中使用的不同的统计方法的研究结果,以分析(微)活动星系核(AGN)的地面光学观测的变化。特别是,我们专注于应用所谓的C和F统计,这是基于标准差和方差的比率,分别得到的结果之间的比较。这样做的动机是,这些方法的实施导致不同的和矛盾的结果,使得某个源的光变曲线的变异性分类取决于实施的统计。为此目的,我们重新分析的结果上的活动星系核样品观察了几次会议与2.15米的“豪尔赫Sahade”望远镜(CASLEO),阿根廷圣胡安。对于每个活动星系核,我们构造了夜间差分光变曲线。因此,我们获得了39个活动星系核的78条光变曲线,然后我们应用上述统计检验,以重新分类这些光变曲线的变化状态,并试图找到合适的统计方法来研究光度(微)变化。我们的结论是,虽然$C$标准是不适当的统计检验,它仍然可以是一个合适的参数,以检测变异性,它的应用使我们能够得到更可靠的变异性结果,与F检验相比。

英文摘要:

We present the results of a study of different statistical methods currently used in the literature to analyse the (micro)variability of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) from ground-based optical observations. In particular, we focus on the comparison between the results obtained by applying the so-called C and F statistics, which are based on the ratio of standard deviations and variances, respectively. The motivation for this is that the implementation of these methods leads to different and contradictory results, making the variability classification of the light curves of a certain source dependent on the statistics implemented. For this purpose, we re-analyse the results on an AGN sample observed along several sessions with the 2.15m "Jorge Sahade" telescope (CASLEO), San Juan, Argentina. For each AGN we constructed the nightly differential light curves. We thus obtained a total of 78 light curves for 39 AGNs, and we then applied the statistical tests mentioned above, in order to re-classify the variability state of these light curves and in an attempt to find the suitable statistical methodology to study photometric (micro)variations. We conclude that, although the $C$ criterion is not proper a statistical test, it could still be a suitable parameter to detect variability and that its application allows us to get more reliable variability results, in contrast with the F test.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑