arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1608.01698astro-ph.GA
收藏

银河系的厚盘和薄盘:有明显的厚盘吗?

Milky Way's Thick and Thin disk: Is there distinct thick disk?

D. Kawata, C. Chiappini

摘要:

这篇文章是基于我们在592 WE-Heraeus研讨会上关于银河系模型的讨论会,重建银河系的历史:光谱调查,天体地震学和化学动力学模型。讨论的重点是以下问题:“是否存在不同的厚盘和薄盘?".这个问题的答案取决于人们对薄磁盘和厚磁盘所采用的定义。这次讨论的参与者一致认为银河系中至少有两种不同类型的圆盘。然而,关于如何最好地定义这两种类型的圆盘(化学上、运动学上、几何上或年龄上?)仍然存在重要的悬而未决的问题。不同的圆盘的起源是什么,这个问题仍然悬而未决。这次会议强调的未来银河系调查应该有助于我们回答这些问题。近一个小时的辩论涉及该领域的研究人员,代表不同的建模方法(银河系模型,如TRILEGAL,贝桑松和银河系,化学演化模型,扩展分布函数方法,宇宙学背景下的化学动力学,以及自洽的宇宙学模拟),说明了拥有所有这些并行方法的重要性。所有的方法都有其优点和缺点(也讨论过),不同的方法对于解决特定的问题是有用的,这些问题可能有助于我们回答上面更一般的问题。

英文摘要:

This article is based on our discussion session on Milky Way models at the 592 WE-Heraeus Seminar, Reconstructing the Milky Way's History: Spectroscopic Surveys, Asteroseismology and Chemodynamical models. The discussion focused on the following question: "Are there distinct thick and thin disks?". The answer to this question depends on the definition one adopts for thin and thick disks. The participants of this discussion converged to the idea that there are at least two different types of disks in the Milky Way. However, there are still important open questions on how to best define these two types of disks (chemically, kinematically, geometrically or by age?). The question of what is the origin of the distinct disks remains open. The future Galactic surveys which are highlighted in this conference should help us answering these questions. The almost one-hour debate involving researchers in the field representing different modelling approaches (Galactic models such as TRILEGAL, Besancon and Galaxia, chemical evolution models, extended distribution functions method, chemodynamics in the cosmological context, and self-consistent cosmological simulations) illustrated how important is to have all these parallel approaches. All approaches have their advantages and shortcomings (also discussed), and different approaches are useful to address specific points that might help us answering the more general question above.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑