在附加效用下划分货物或货物
Dividing goods or bads under additive utilities
摘要：
我们比较了平均主义等价和收入相等的竞争均衡规则来划分一捆货物（传家宝）或一捆货物（家务）。对于商品，竞争性部门的表现更好，因为它是资源单调的，并且更难战略性地误报偏好。但对于坏的，竞争规则，不像平等主义的规则，是多值的，更难计算，不允许连续选择。我们还提供了一个公理化的竞争规则的基础上简单制定的Maskin单调性下添加剂的效用。
英文摘要：
We compare the Egalitarian Equivalent and the Competitive Equilibrium with Equal Incomes rules to divide a bundle of goods (heirlooms) or a bundle of bads (chores). For goods the Competitive division fares better, as it is Resource Monotonic, and makes it harder to strategically misreport preferences. But for bads, the Competitive rule, unlike the Egalitarian one, is multivalued, harder to compute, and admits no continuous selection. We also provide an axiomatic characterization of the Competitive rule based on the simple formulation of Maskin Monotonicity under additive utilities.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
