arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 1605.05414cs.CLcs.LG

On the Evaluation of Dialogue Systems with Next Utterance Classification

McGill University(麦吉尔大学);Université de Montréal(蒙特利尔大学);HEC Montréal(蒙特利尔高等商学院)

Ryan Lowe, Iulian V. Serban, Mike Noseworthy, Laurent Charlin, Joelle Pineau

英文摘要:

An open challenge in constructing dialogue systems is developing methods for automatically learning dialogue strategies from large amounts of unlabelled data. Recent work has proposed Next-Utterance-Classification (NUC) as a surrogate task for building dialogue systems from text data. In this paper we investigate the performance of humans on this task to validate the relevance of NUC as a method of evaluation. Our results show three main findings: (1) humans are able to correctly classify responses at a rate much better than chance, thus confirming that the task is feasible, (2) human performance levels vary across task domains (we consider 3 datasets) and expertise levels (novice vs experts), thus showing that a range of performance is possible on this type of task, (3) automated dialogue systems built using state-of-the-art machine learning methods have similar performance to the human novices, but worse than the experts, thus confirming the utility of this class of tasks for driving further research in automated dialogue systems.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑