arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1605.04553cs.CL
收藏

一种基于共性列表的语言相似度数据集方案

A Proposal for Linguistic Similarity Datasets Based on Commonality Lists

Queen Mary University of London(伦敦玛丽女王大学)

Dmitrijs Milajevs, Sascha Griffiths

摘要:

相似性是心理学和语言学的两个分支(理论和计算)中使用的核心概念。来自这两个领域的相似性数据集在设计上有所不同:心理数据集集中在某个主题上,如水果名称,而语言数据集包含来自不同类别的单词。后者使人类对没有共同点的单词和意义上有差异的单词分配低相似性分数,使相似性分数模糊不清。在这项工作中,我们讨论了多类别数据集的相似性收集过程,避免得分模糊,并建议改变评估程序,以反映心理文献的见解,单词,短语和句子的相似性。我们建议要求人类提供一个共同点和差异的列表,而不是数值相似性分数,并采用人类判断的结构,超越成对相似性模型评估。我们相信,所提出的方法将产生的数据集,测试的意义表示模型更彻底的人类治疗的相似性。

英文摘要:

Similarity is a core notion that is used in psychology and two branches of linguistics: theoretical and computational. The similarity datasets that come from the two fields differ in design: psychological datasets are focused around a certain topic such as fruit names, while linguistic datasets contain words from various categories. The later makes humans assign low similarity scores to the words that have nothing in common and to the words that have contrast in meaning, making similarity scores ambiguous. In this work we discuss the similarity collection procedure for a multi-category dataset that avoids score ambiguity and suggest changes to the evaluation procedure to reflect the insights of psychological literature for word, phrase and sentence similarity. We suggest to ask humans to provide a list of commonalities and differences instead of numerical similarity scores and employ the structure of human judgements beyond pairwise similarity for model evaluation. We believe that the proposed approach will give rise to datasets that test meaning representation models more thoroughly with respect to the human treatment of similarity.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑