arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1604.03260astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
收藏

在Seyfert I星系IC4329A中确认的新的初级X射线成分

The New Primary X-ray Component Confirmed in the Seyfert I Galaxy IC4329A

Katsuma Miyake, Hirofumi Noda, Shin'ya Yamada, Kazuo Makishima, Kazuhiro Nakazawa

摘要:

2007年8月,朱雀号对明亮且高度可变的塞弗特I活动星系核IC 4329 A进行了5次观测,间隔约为5天,每次净曝光量为24-31 ks。2012年8月进行了另一次更长时间的观察,净暴露量为118千磅。在6次观测中,源在2-45 keV内被探测到,平均2-10 keV通量为$(0.67-1.2)\times10^{-10}$ erg cm $^{-2}$ s $^{-1}$。在2007年的5次观测中,强度变化了2倍,在2012年的观测中变化了1.5倍。这些观测结果之间的差异光谱表明,IC 4329 A的变异性主要是由一个光子指数为$Γ\sim2.0$的幂律分量进行的。然而,除了这个主要分量和相关反射之外,宽带朱雀数据还需要另一个更硬、可变性更小的$Γ\sim1.4$分量。通过Noda等人(2013 a)开发的光谱分解技术分析相同的6个数据集,也证实了这种新连续体的存在。这个$Γ\sim1.4$连续体被认为是一个新的主要成分,到目前为止还没有在IC 4329 A的光谱中被识别出来,尽管它最近在其他几个塞弗特I星系的光谱中被识别出来(Noda et al. 2013 a,2014)。

英文摘要:

The bright and highly-variable Seyfert I Active Galactic Nucleus, IC4329A, was observed with Suzaku 5 times in 2007 August with intervals of ~ 5 days, and a net exposure of 24-31 ks each. Another longer observation was carried out in 2012 August with a net exposure of 118 ks. In the 6 observations, the source was detected in 2-45 keV with average 2-10 keV fluxes of $(0.67-1.2)\times10^{-10}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. The intensity changed by a factor of 2 among the 5 observations in 2007, and 1.5 within the 2012 observation. Difference spectra among these observations revealed that the variability of IC4329A was carried mainly by a power-law component with a photon index $Γ\sim2.0$. However, in addition to this primary component and the associated reflection, the broad-band Suzaku data required another, harder, and less variable component with $Γ\sim1.4$. The presence of this new continuum was also confirmed by analyzing the same 6 data sets through the spectral decomposition technique developed by Noda et al. 2013a. This $Γ\sim1.4$ continuum is considered to be a new primary component that has not been recognized in the spectra of IC4329A so far, although it was recently identified in those of several other Seyfert I galaxies (Noda et al. 2013a, 2014).

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑