arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1506.06384astro-ph.COgr-qc
收藏

改进的重力N体代码比较项目

Modified Gravity N-body Code Comparison Project

Hans A. Winther, Fabian Schmidt, Alexandre Barreira, Christian Arnold, Sownak Bose, Claudio Llinares, Marco Baldi, Bridget Falck, Wojciech A. Hellwing, Kazuya K… 展开作者

Hans A. Winther, Fabian Schmidt, Alexandre Barreira, Christian Arnold, Sownak Bose, Claudio Llinares, Marco Baldi, Bridget Falck, Wojciech A. Hellwing, Kazuya Koyama, Baojiu Li, David F. Mota, Ewald Puchwein, Robert E. Smith, Gong-Bo Zhao

摘要:

自洽的${\it N}$体模拟的修改后的重力模型是一个关键的组成部分,以获得严格的约束偏离广义相对论使用大尺度结构的意见。本文提供了第一个详细的比较结果的不同${\it N}$体代码的$f(R)$,DGP和对称模型,从相同的初始条件。我们发现,从$Λ$ CDM同意的物质功率谱的分数偏差比$1\%$高达$k \sim 5-10~h/{\rm Mpc}$之间的不同代码。因此,这些代码能够满足即将进行的观测调查的严格精度要求。所有程序对速度散度功率谱、晕丰度和晕剖面的计算结果也是一致的。我们还测试了准静态限制,这是在大多数修改后的重力${\it N}$体代码,对称模型,其中最显着的非静态效应之间的模型考虑的预期。我们的结论是,这个限制是一个很好的近似所有的观察在这里考虑。

英文摘要:

Self-consistent ${\it N}$-body simulations of modified gravity models are a key ingredient to obtain rigorous constraints on deviations from General Relativity using large-scale structure observations. This paper provides the first detailed comparison of the results of different ${\it N}$-body codes for the $f(R)$, DGP, and Symmetron models, starting from the same initial conditions. We find that the fractional deviation of the matter power spectrum from $Λ$CDM agrees to better than $1\%$ up to $k \sim 5-10~h/{\rm Mpc}$ between the different codes. These codes are thus able to meet the stringent accuracy requirements of upcoming observational surveys. All codes are also in good agreement in their results for the velocity divergence power spectrum, halo abundances and halo profiles. We also test the quasi-static limit, which is employed in most modified gravity ${\it N}$-body codes, for the Symmetron model for which the most significant non-static effects among the models considered are expected. We conclude that this limit is a very good approximation for all of the observables considered here.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑