arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 1503.03622physics.med-ph
收藏

点和体积变化的各种可变形图像配准的评价

Evaluation of various Deformable Image Registrations for Point and Volume Variations

Su Chul Han, Sang Hyun Choi, Seungwoo Park, Soon Sung Lee, Haijo Jung, Mi-Sook Kim, Hyung Jun Yoo, Young Hoon Ji, Chul Young Yi, Kum Bae Kim

摘要:

变形图像配准(REDD)的准确性在放射治疗计划中具有显著的剂量学影响。我们使用变形点和体积的变化来评估各种不同算法的准确性。首先使用虚拟变形QA软件(ImSimQA,Oncology System Limited,UK)生成参考图像(Iref)和体积(Iref)。我们根据变形的类型,即变形1是为了增加松弛(松弛),变形2是为了减少,用变形点和松弛的轴向移动来变形Iref。通过ImSimQA软件获得的变形图像(Idef)和体积(Vdef)使用反变换算法逆变形为Iref和Iref。结果,我们从Idef获取变形图像(Iid),从Vdef获取体积(Vid)。算法包括Horn Schunk光流(HS)、迭代光流(IOF)、Modified Demons(MD)和Fast Demons(FD),采用MATLAB的可变形图像配准和自适应放射治疗工具包(DIRART)。使用归一化互信息(NMI)和归一化互相关(NCC)度量来计算Iref和Iid之间的图像相似性。当变形点移动距离为4mm时,所有算法的NMI均在1.81以上,NCC均在0.99以上,当变形点移动距离增加或减少约12%时,无论何种变形,NMI与Vid的差值均在5%以内,除MD算法外,变形1的Dice相似系数(DSC)均在0.95以上。在变形2的情况下,DSC的在所有的迭代算法中均大于0.95。Idef和Vdef尚未完全恢复到Iref和Iref,并且Iref算法的精度根据变形程度而不同。因此,应该针对所需的应用程序来验证并行计算算法的性能。

英文摘要:

The accuracy of deformable image registration (DIR) has a significant dosimetric impact in radiation treatment planning. We evaluated accuracy of various DIR algorithms using variations of the deformation point and volume. The reference image (Iref) and volume (Vref) was first generated with virtual deformation QA software (ImSimQA, Oncology System Limited, UK). We deformed Iref with axial movement of deformation point and Vref depending on the types of deformation that are the deformation1 is to increase the Vref (relaxation) and the deformation 2 is to decrease . The deformed image (Idef) and volume (Vdef) acquired by ImSimQA software were inversely deformed to Iref and Vref using DIR algorithms. As a result, we acquired deformed image (Iid) from Idef and volume (Vid) from Vdef. The DIR algorithms were the Horn Schunk optical flow (HS), Iterative Optical Flow (IOF), Modified Demons (MD) and Fast Demons (FD) with the Deformable Image Registration and Adaptive Radiotherapy Toolkit (DIRART) of MATLAB. The image similarity between Iref and Iid was calculated using the metrics that were Normalized Mutual Information (NMI) and Normalized Cross Correlation (NCC). When moving distance of deformation point was 4 mm, the value of NMI was above 1.81 and NCC was above 0.99 in all DIR algorithms.When the Vref increased or decreased about 12%, the difference between Vref and Vid was within 5% regardless of the type of deformation.The value of Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) was above 0.95 in deformation1 except for the MD algorithm. In case of deformation 2, that of DSC was above 0.95 in all DIR algorithms. The Idef and Vdef have not been completely restored to Iref and Vref and the accuracy of DIR algorithms was different depending on the degree of deformation. Hence, the performance of DIR algorithms should be verified for the desired applications.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑