arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1503.01158cs.AIcs.LGstat.ML
收藏

异常检测问题的元分析

A Meta-Analysis of the Anomaly Detection Problem

Oregon State University(俄勒冈州立大学)

Andrew Emmott, Shubhomoy Das, Thomas Dietterich, Alan Fern, Weng-Keen Wong

摘要:

本文提供了一个彻底的元分析异常检测问题。为了实现这一点,我们首先确定方法基准异常检测算法在文献中,并产生一个大型语料库的异常检测基准,在他们的建设不同的几个方面,我们认为重要的现实世界的应用程序:(a)点的难度,(b)异常的相对频率,(c)异常的集群,(d)相关性的功能。我们应用一组有代表性的异常检测算法,这个语料库,产生了非常大的收集实验结果。我们分析这些结果,以了解在以前的工作中观察到的许多现象。首先,我们观察实验设计对实验结果的影响。其次,使用两个指标评估结果,ROC曲线下面积和平均精度。我们采用统计假设检验来证明我们的基准的价值(或缺乏)。然后,我们提供了几种方法来总结我们的实验结果,得出几个结论,我们的方法的影响,以及一些算法的优点和缺点。最后,我们将结果与一个平凡的解决方案进行比较,作为一种替代手段,规范化报告的算法性能。这篇文章的预期贡献有很多,除了提供一个大型的公开语料库的异常检测基准,我们提供了一个本体描述异常检测上下文,控制基准创建的各个方面的方法,未来的实验设计的指导方针,并讨论了许多潜在的陷阱,试图衡量在这一领域的成功。

英文摘要:

This article provides a thorough meta-analysis of the anomaly detection problem. To accomplish this we first identify approaches to benchmarking anomaly detection algorithms across the literature and produce a large corpus of anomaly detection benchmarks that vary in their construction across several dimensions we deem important to real-world applications: (a) point difficulty, (b) relative frequency of anomalies, (c) clusteredness of anomalies, and (d) relevance of features. We apply a representative set of anomaly detection algorithms to this corpus, yielding a very large collection of experimental results. We analyze these results to understand many phenomena observed in previous work. First we observe the effects of experimental design on experimental results. Second, results are evaluated with two metrics, ROC Area Under the Curve and Average Precision. We employ statistical hypothesis testing to demonstrate the value (or lack thereof) of our benchmarks. We then offer several approaches to summarizing our experimental results, drawing several conclusions about the impact of our methodology as well as the strengths and weaknesses of some algorithms. Last, we compare results against a trivial solution as an alternate means of normalizing the reported performance of algorithms. The intended contributions of this article are many; in addition to providing a large publicly-available corpus of anomaly detection benchmarks, we provide an ontology for describing anomaly detection contexts, a methodology for controlling various aspects of benchmark creation, guidelines for future experimental design and a discussion of the many potential pitfalls of trying to measure success in this field.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑