arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1502.07200astro-ph.SR
收藏

日冕发射线偏振矢量层析成像直接观测日冕磁场

Direct Observation of Coronal Magnetic Fields by Vector Tomography of the Coronal Emission Line Polarizations

M. Kramar, H. Lin, S. Tomczyk

摘要:

本文介绍了第一次直接“观察”的全球规模,三维日冕磁场的卡林顿旋转(CR)周期2112使用矢量层析反演技术。矢量层析成像反演使用观测测量的Fe { \sc{xiii} } 10747日冕Hanle效应偏振信号的日冕多通道偏振计(CoMP)和日冕密度和温度结构从标量层析成像反演的STEREO/EUVI日冕发射线(CEL)强度图像作为输入,以获得一个日冕磁场模型,最好地再现所观察到的偏振信号。虽然不能进行独立的验证的矢量层析成像结果,我们比较了层析成像反演的冠状磁场与磁流体动力学(MHD)模拟的基础上观察到的光球磁场的CR 2112和2113。我们发现,CR 2112的MHD模型是定性一致的层析成像反演结果的大部分重建域,除了一对夫妇的区域。特别是对于一个最值得注意的例外区域,我们发现,CR 2113的MHD模拟预测的模型更接近于矢量层析成像反向磁场。我们讨论了层析反演技术的效用和局限性,并提出了未来发展的想法。

英文摘要:

This article presents the first direct "observation" of the global-scale, 3D coronal magnetic fields of Carrington Rotation (CR) Cycle 2112 using vector tomographic inversion techniques. The Vector tomographic inversion uses observational measurements of the Fe {\sc{xiii}} 10747 Å Hanle effect polarization signals by the Coronal Multichannel Polarimeter (CoMP) and coronal density and temperature structures derived from scalar tomographic inversion of STEREO/EUVI coronal emission lines (CELs) intensity images as inputs to derive a coronal magnetic field model that best reproduces the observed polarization signals. While independent verifications of the vector tomography results cannot be performed, we compared the tomography inverted coronal magnetic fields with those constructed by MagnetoHydroDynamic (MHD) simulation based on observed photospheric magnetic fields of CR 2112 and 2113. We found that the MHD model for CR 2112 is qualitatively consistent with the tomography inverted result for most of the reconstruction domain except for a couple of regions. Particularly for one of the most noticeable exception region, we found that the MHD simulation for CR 2113 predicted a model that more closely resemble the vector tomography inverted magnetic fields. We discuss the utilities and limitations of the tomographic inversion technique, and present ideas for future developments.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑