量子力学中的模态、势和矛盾
Modality, Potentiality and Contradiction in Quantum Mechanics
摘要：
在[11]中，Newton da Costa与本文作者一起论证了用次协调方法考虑量子叠加的可能性。我们声称，尽管对量子力学（QM）的大多数解释都试图逃避矛盾，但有许多迹象表明，从事这类研究可能是值得的。最近，Arenhart和Krause [1，2，3]提出了几个反对这种方法的论点，并声称，考虑到反对的平方，量子叠加更好地理解为矛盾命题而不是矛盾命题。在[17]中，我们捍卫了量子叠加的次协调方法（PAQS），并提供了支持其发展的论据。本文分析了量子力学中模态、势和矛盾的含义，并进一步论证了为什么PAQS比Arenhart-Krause提出的量子叠加的多样性方法（CAQS）更适合于面对量子技术迫使我们考虑的解释性问题。
英文摘要：
In [11], Newton da Costa together with the author of this paper argued in favor of the possibility to consider quantum superpositions in terms of a paraconsistent approach. We claimed that, even though most interpretations of quantum mechanics (QM) attempt to escape contradictions, there are many hints that indicate it could be worth while to engage in a research of this kind. Recently, Arenhart and Krause [1, 2, 3] have raised several arguments against this approach and claimed that, taking into account the square of opposition, quantum superpositions are better understood in terms of contrariety propositions rather than contradictory propositions. In [17] we defended the Paraconsistent Approach to Quantum Superpositions (PAQS) and provided arguments in favor of its development. In the present paper we attempt to analyze the meanings of modality, potentiality and contradiction in QM, and provide further arguments of why the PAQS is better suited, than the Contrariety Approach to Quantum Superpositions (CAQS) proposed by Arenhart and Krause, to face the interpretational questions that quantum technology is forcing us to consider.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
