arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1502.03887astro-ph.GA
收藏

强引力透镜对GOODS和XDF空白区4<z<8观测Lyman-Break星系数的影响

The Impact of Strong Gravitational Lensing on Observed Lyman-Break Galaxy Numbers at 4<z<8 in the GOODS and the XDF Blank Fields

R. L. Barone-Nugent, J. S. B Wyithe, M. Trenti, T. Treu, P. Oesch, R. Bouwens, G. D. Illingworth, K. B. Schmidt

摘要:

在高红移的星系团和空白场中,前景偏转器引起的引力透镜效应都会影响到对莱曼-布雷克星系团的探测。我们量化的影响,强放大的样本$B$,$V$,$i$,$z$ $\&$ $Y$ LBG($4\lesssim z \lesssim8$)中观察到的XDF和GOODS/CANDELS领域,通过调查接近的辍学前景对象。我们发现,$\sim6\%$明亮的LBG($m_{H_{160}}<26$)在$z\sim7$已强烈透镜($μ>2$)的前景对象。该分数从$z\sim6$的$\sim 3.5\%$降低至$z\sim4$的$\sim1.5\%$。由于观测到的强透镜星系的比例是光度函数(LF)形状的函数,它可以用来推导Schechter参数,$α$和$M_{\star}$,独立于星系数计数。我们的放大率偏差分析产生Schechter函数参数与星系计数确定的参数密切一致,尽管具有较大的不确定性。我们的分析外推到$z\gtrsim 8$表明,未来的调查与JSWT,WFIRST和EUCLID应该找到多余的LBG在明亮的一端,即使有一个内在的指数截止的数量计数。最后,我们强调如何放大率偏差测量的检测极限附近可以被用来作为探测人口的星系太微弱,无法检测。使用这种新想法的初步结果表明,如果$α\lesssim -1.7$远低于XDF中的当前检测限,则$M_{UV}\sim -18$的放大偏倚不如预期的那么强。从表面上看,这意味着LF在$M_{UV}\gtrsim-16.5$处变平。然而,选择效应和完整性估计难以精确量化。因此,我们不排除延伸到$M_{UV}\gtrsim -15$的陡峭LF。

英文摘要:

Detection of Lyman-Break Galaxies (LBGs) at high-redshift can be affected by gravitational lensing induced by foreground deflectors not only in galaxy clusters, but also in blank fields. We quantify the impact of strong magnification in the samples of $B$, $V$, $i$, $z$ $\&$ $Y$ LBGs ($4\lesssim z \lesssim8$) observed in the XDF and GOODS/CANDELS fields, by investigating the proximity of dropouts to foreground objects. We find that $\sim6\%$ of bright LBGs ($m_{H_{160}}<26$) at $z\sim7$ have been strongly lensed ($μ>2$) by foreground objects. This fraction decreases from $\sim 3.5\%$ at $z\sim6$ to $\sim1.5\%$ at $z\sim4$. Since the observed fraction of strongly lensed galaxies is a function of the shape of the luminosity function (LF), it can be used to derive Schechter parameters, $α$ and $M_{\star}$, independently from galaxy number counts. Our magnification bias analysis yields Schechter-function parameters in close agreement with those determined from galaxy counts albeit with larger uncertainties. Extrapolation of our analysis to $z\gtrsim 8$ suggests that future surveys with JSWT, WFIRST and EUCLID should find excess LBGs at the bright-end, even if there is an intrinsic exponential cutoff of number counts. Finally, we highlight how the magnification bias measurement near the detection limit can be used as probe of the population of galaxies too faint to be detected. Preliminary results using this novel idea suggest that the magnification bias at $M_{UV}\sim -18$ is not as strong as expected if $α\lesssim -1.7$ extends well below the current detection limits in the XDF. At face value this implies a flattening of the LF at $M_{UV}\gtrsim-16.5$. However, selection effects and completeness estimates are difficult to quantify precisely. Thus, we do not rule out a steep LF extending to $M_{UV}\gtrsim -15$.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑