arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1502.00626physics.plasm-phastro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
收藏

天体物理无碰撞等离子体的碰撞行为

Collisional behaviors of astrophysical collisionless plasmas

Antoine Bret

摘要:

在碰撞流体中,许多关键过程依赖于二元碰撞的频率。当两种流体足够快地碰撞时,碰撞似乎是产生冲击波的必要条件,以满足朗肯-雨果尼奥关系,建立状态方程或麦克斯韦分布。然而,这些看似碰撞的特征通常被观察到或假设与碰撞\emph{less}天体物理等离子体有关。本文将回顾我们目前对以下问题的回答:碰撞的无碰撞等离子体如何最终产生像流体一样的冲击?在这种情况下,兰金-于戈纽关系在多大程度上得到了满足?无碰撞冲击是否像流体冲击一样传播?我们能不能用状态方程来描述无碰撞的等离子体,就像天体物理学中的MHD代码那样?为什么麦克斯韦分布在无碰撞冲击的Particle-In-Cell模拟中无处不在?定义碰撞和无碰撞行为之间边界的时间和长度尺度将在相关时给出。一般来说,当可以忽略导致流体行为的无碰撞过程中所涉及的时间和长度尺度时,系统可以被视为流体。

英文摘要:

In collisional fluids, a number of key processes rely on the frequency of binary collisions. Collisions seem necessary to generate a shock wave when two fluids collide fast enough, to fulfill the Rankine-Hugoniot relations, to establish an equation of state or a Maxwellian distribution. Yet, these seemingly collisional features are routinely either observed or assumed, in relation with collision\emph{less} astrophysical plasmas. This article will review our current answers to the following questions: How do colliding collisionless plasmas end-up generating a shock as if they were fluids? To which extent are the Rankine-Hugoniot relations fulfilled in this case? Do collisionless shocks propagate like fluid ones? Can we use an equation of state to describe collisionless plasmas, like MHD codes for astrophysics do? Why are Maxwellian distributions ubiquitous in Particle-In-Cell simulations of collisionless shocks? Time and length scales defining the border between the collisional and the collisionless behavior will be given when relevant. In general, when the time and length scales involved in the collisionless processes responsible for the fluid-like behavior may be neglected, the system may be treated like a fluid.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑