arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1410.7839astro-ph.CO
收藏

弱透镜与大小、磁密和磁密

Weak Lensing with Sizes, Magnitudes and Shapes

Justin Alsing, Donnacha Kirk, Alan Heavens, Andrew Jaffe

摘要:

弱透镜效应可以通过对遥远星系的图像的许多影响来观察;它们的形状被剪切,它们的大小和通量(幅度)被放大,它们在天空中的位置被透镜场改变。星系的形状探测剪切场,而大小、星等和数密度探测会聚场。两者都包含宇宙学信息。在本文中,我们关注的是作为宇宙会聚探测器的单个星系的大小和星等的放大。我们开发了一个贝叶斯方法推断的收敛场从测量的大小,幅度和红移,并证明收敛的推断需要详细的知识的联合分布的内在大小和幅度。我们建立了一个简单的参数化模型的大小星等分布和估计CFHTLenS星系的分布。根据测量的分布,我们表明,收敛估计的典型色散为~0.8,而剪切为~0.38。我们讨论了物理系统学用于放大的可能性(类似于剪切的内在对齐),并计算来自组合放大与剪切的暗能量品质因数(FoM)中的预期增益,用于关于系统学的不同场景:当考虑内在比对但不考虑放大信号的系统学时,包括放大可以将FoM提高高达~2.5倍,而当考虑到剪切和放大的物理系统学时,我们预计增益在~25%和~ 65%之间。除了统计学上的收获,宇宙剪切和放大受到不同系统学的影响,这一事实使放大成为任何宇宙剪切分析的一个有吸引力的补充。

英文摘要:

Weak lensing can be observed through a number of effects on the images of distant galaxies; their shapes are sheared, their sizes and fluxes (magnitudes) are magnified and their positions on the sky are modified by the lensing field. Galaxy shapes probe the shear field whilst size, magnitude and number density probe the convergence field. Both contain cosmological information. In this paper we are concerned with the magnification of the size and magnitude of individual galaxies as a probe of cosmic convergence. We develop a Bayesian approach for inferring the convergence field from a measured size, magnitude and redshift and demonstrate that the inference on convergence requires detailed knowledge of the joint distribution of intrinsic sizes and magnitudes. We build a simple parameterised model for the size-magnitude distribution and estimate this distribution for CFHTLenS galaxies. In light of the measured distribution, we show that the typical dispersion on convergence estimation is ~0.8, compared to ~0.38 for shear. We discuss the possibility of physical systematics for magnification (similar to intrinsic alignments for shear) and compute the expected gains in the Dark Energy Figure-of-Merit (FoM) from combining magnification with shear for different scenarios regarding systematics: when accounting for intrinsic alignments but no systematics on the magnification signal, including magnification could improve the FoM by upto a factor of ~2.5, whilst when accounting for physical systematics in both shear and magnification we anticipate a gain between ~25% and ~65%. In addition to the statistical gains, the fact that cosmic shear and magnification are subject to different systematics makes magnification an attractive complement to any cosmic shear analysis.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑