arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1408.2633physics.flu-dyn
收藏

螺旋turbulence的改进亚网格模型及大涡模拟方法

An improved helical subgrid-scale model and large-eddy simulation methods in helical turbulence

changping Yu

摘要:

针对螺旋状各向同性湍流,提出了一种改进的两项螺旋亚网格尺度(SGS)模型,并给出了四种用于大涡模拟(LES)的动力学方法,包括标准动力学方法、最小二乘和动力学方法、单螺旋度耗散约束动力学方法和能量和螺旋度耗散双约束动力学方法。在稳态和衰减螺旋各向同性湍流中进行了先验和后验测试,将四种类型的动态螺旋模型和动态Smogorinsky模型与直接数值模拟(DNS)的结果进行了比较。数值结果表明,三种新的动力螺旋模型对能量和螺旋度演化的预测优于标准动力螺旋模型,两种约束螺旋模型对能量和螺旋度耗散率的预测优于其他模型.此外,约束螺旋模型与真实SGS应力具有更高的相关性,并且与DNS结果具有更相似的概率密度函数(PDF)。总的来说,这两个约束螺旋模型显示出一些更有吸引力的功能比其他模型。

英文摘要:

For helical isotropic turbulence, an improved two-term helical subgrid-scale (SGS) model is proposed and four types of dynamic methods are given to do large-eddy simulation (LES), which include the standard dynamic procedure, the least quatratic sum dynamic procedure, the dynamic procedure with single con- straint of helicity dissipation and the dynamic one with dual constraints of energy and helicity dissipation. Tested a priori and a posteriori in both steady and decaying helical isotropic turbulence, the four types of dynamic helical models and the dynamic Smogorinsky model are compared with results of direct numerical simulations (DNS) together. Numerical results demonstrate that the three new types of dynamic helical models predict energy and helicity evolution better than the standard dynamic helical model, and the two constrained helical models predict the energy and helicity dissipation rates better than other models. Fur- thermore, the constrained helical models have higher correlation to the real SGS stress and have more similar probability density functions (PDF) to the DNS results. In general, the two constrained helical models show some more attractive features than other models.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑