arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1402.0147eess.SYcs.SYmath.OC

一种用于F-16控制器非线性鲁棒性分析的概率方法

A Probabilistic Method for Nonlinear Robustness Analysis of F-16 Controllers

Texas A&M University(德克萨斯农工大学)

Abhishek Halder, Kooktae Lee, Raktim Bhattacharya

AI总结:

本文提出一种概率方法,用于评估F-16飞机纵向飞行闭环性能下的控制器鲁棒性,比较LQR和gsLQR在存在随机初始条件和参数不确定性时的性能,证明gsLQR在中间时间具有更好的暂态性能。

摘要:

本文提出了一种新的框架,用于验证F-16飞机闭环性能下的控制器鲁棒性。我们比较了线性二次调节器(LQR)和增益调度线性二次调节器(gsLQR)在存在随机初始条件、参数不确定性和执行器扰动下的状态调节性能。我们证明,在仅存在初始条件不确定性的情况下,LQR和gsLQR的即时和渐近性能具有可比性,但gsLQR在中间时间具有更好的暂态性能。此外,gsLQR在面对参数不确定性时比LQR更鲁棒。所提出的概率框架利用基于转移算子的密度计算进行精确算术,并引入最优传输理论的性能验证和验证(V&V)方法用于非线性动力系统。所提出方法的数值结果与蒙特卡洛模拟一致。

英文摘要:

This paper presents a new framework for controller robustness verification with respect to F-16 aircraft's closed-loop performance in longitudinal flight. We compare the state regulation performance of a linear quadratic regulator (LQR) and a gain-scheduled linear quadratic regulator (gsLQR), applied to nonlinear open-loop dynamics of F-16, in presence of stochastic initial condition and parametric uncertainties, as well as actuator disturbance. We show that, in presence of initial condition uncertainties alone, both LQR and gsLQR have comparable immediate and asymptotic performances, but the gsLQR exhibits better transient performance at intermediate times. This remains true in the presence of additional actuator disturbance. Also, gsLQR is shown to be more robust than LQR, against parametric uncertainties. The probabilistic framework proposed here, leverages transfer operator based density computation in exact arithmetic and introduces optimal transport theoretic performance validation and verification (V&V) for nonlinear dynamical systems. Numerical results from our proposed method, are in unison with Monte Carlo simulations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑