arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1401.5367cs.SE
收藏

软件产品线组合交互测试的基准和比较框架

Towards a Benchmark and a Comparison Framework for Combinatorial Interaction Testing of Software Product Lines

Roberto E. Lopez-Herrejon, Javier Ferrer, Francisco Chicano, Evelyn Nicole Haslinger, Alexander Egyed, Enrique Alba

摘要:

随着软件产品线(SPL)成为一种更普遍的开发实践,其有效的测试正成为一个更重要的关注。在过去的几年中,许多SPL测试方法已被提出,其中,是那些支持组合交互测试(CIT)的前提是选择一组产品的故障,由于功能的相互作用,更容易发生。目前国内外已提出了多种声压级CIT测试技术,但还没有对它们进行系统、全面的比较。为了实现这样的目标,两个项目是重要的:一个共同的基准的功能模型,和一个适当的比较框架。在这篇研究进展中的论文中,我们提出了19个特征模型作为基准的基础,我们将其应用于三种不同的技术,以分析Perrouin等人提出的比较框架。我们确定了这个框架的缺点,并阐述了进一步研究的替代方案。

英文摘要:

As Software Product Lines (SPLs) are becoming a more pervasive development practice, their effective testing is becoming a more important concern. In the past few years many SPL testing approaches have been proposed, among them, are those that support Combinatorial Interaction Testing (CIT) whose premise is to select a group of products where faults, due to feature interactions, are more likely to occur. Many CIT techniques for SPL testing have been put forward; however, no systematic and comprehensive comparison among them has been performed. To achieve such goal two items are important: a common benchmark of feature models, and an adequate comparison framework. In this research-in-progress paper, we propose 19 feature models as the base of a benchmark, which we apply to three different techniques in order to analyze the comparison framework proposed by Perrouin et al. We identify the shortcomings of this framework and elaborate alternatives for further study.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑