arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1312.2159cs.SI
收藏

MOOC中的社会学习学习:从统计分析到生成模型

Learning about social learning in MOOCs: From statistical analysis to generative model

Christopher G. Brinton, Mung Chiang, Shaili Jain, Henry Lam, Zhenming Liu, Felix Ming Fai Wong

摘要:

我们研究了2013年夏季大型在线开放课程(MOOC)提供商提供的课程中的用户行为。由于社会学习是MOOC中可扩展教育的关键要素,并且是通过在线讨论论坛完成的,因此我们的主要重点是了解论坛活动。MOOC论坛活动的两个显著特征推动了我们的研究:1。高下降率:对于所有学习的课程,论坛中的讨论量在整个课程期间持续下降。2.高容量,嘈杂的讨论:至少30%的课程产生新的讨论线程的速度是不可行的学生或教学人员通读。此外,很大一部分讨论与课程没有直接关系。我们调查的因素与活动的下降在网上论坛,并找到有效的策略来分类线程和排名其相关性。具体来说,我们使用线性回归模型来分析论坛活动计数数据的时间序列,并进行了一些观察,例如,教师的积极参与增加了讨论量,但并没有减缓下降的速度。然后,我们提出了一个统一的生成模型的讨论线程,这使我们既可以选择有效的线程分类器和设计一个有效的算法排名线程的相关性。我们的排名算法与两个基线算法进行了进一步比较,使用Amazon Mechanical Turk的人工评估。本文的作者按字母顺序排列。对于媒体和新闻报道,请将我们统称为“普林斯顿大学EDGE实验室的研究人员,以及波士顿大学和微软公司的合作者”。"

英文摘要:

We study user behavior in the courses offered by a major Massive Online Open Course (MOOC) provider during the summer of 2013. Since social learning is a key element of scalable education in MOOCs and is done via online discussion forums, our main focus is in understanding forum activities. Two salient features of MOOC forum activities drive our research: 1. High decline rate: for all courses studied, the volume of discussions in the forum declines continuously throughout the duration of the course. 2. High-volume, noisy discussions: at least 30% of the courses produce new discussion threads at rates that are infeasible for students or teaching staff to read through. Furthermore, a substantial portion of the discussions are not directly course-related. We investigate factors that correlate with the decline of activity in the online discussion forums and find effective strategies to classify threads and rank their relevance. Specifically, we use linear regression models to analyze the time series of the count data for the forum activities and make a number of observations, e.g., the teaching staff's active participation in the discussion increases the discussion volume but does not slow down the decline rate. We then propose a unified generative model for the discussion threads, which allows us both to choose efficient thread classifiers and design an effective algorithm for ranking thread relevance. Our ranking algorithm is further compared against two baseline algorithms, using human evaluation from Amazon Mechanical Turk. The authors on this paper are listed in alphabetical order. For media and press coverage, please refer to us collectively, as "researchers from the EDGE Lab at Princeton University, together with collaborators at Boston University and Microsoft Corporation."

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑