对“关于”弯曲背景下标量场的量子与经典不稳定性“一文的答复”
Reply to "Comment on `Quantum versus classical instability of scalar fields in curved backgrounds'"
摘要：
我们证明了arXiv：1310.6252的作者得出结论的推理依赖于一个不正确的标准，规范化的边界解决方案的存在。我们强调，在我们的论文（arXiv：1310.2185）的附录中得出的一般结果，即“没有快子（即，不稳定）模式的最小耦合标量场在渐近平坦的球对称静态时空不包含视界”确实是正确的。
英文摘要：
We show that the reasoning which led the author of arXiv:1310.6252 to reach his conclusions relies on an incorrect criterion for the existence of normalizable bound solutions. We reinforce that the general result derived in the Appendix of our paper (arXiv:1310.2185), namely, that "there are no tachyonic (i.e., unstable) modes for minimally coupled scalar fields in asymptotically flat spherically symmetric static spacetimes containing no horizons" is indeed correct.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
