案例导向物理教育研究中的选择、概括和原因理论
Selection, Generalization, and Theories of Cause in Case-Oriented Physics Education Research
摘要：
以案例为导向的物理教育研究--试图通过将理论与案例联系起来来完善和发展理论--结合了选择数据进行分析、概括结果和提出因果关系主张的独特实践。关于这些做法的未回答的问题可能会限制研究人员更熟悉的复发为导向的研究范式-旨在通过辨别可重复的，有代表性的模式和关系，告知教学预测-参与或批判性地参与以案例为导向的研究。我们使用的结果，从采访物理教育研究人员，研究方法的文献综合，并公布的案例为导向的和复发为导向的研究，以回答“硬打的问题”，研究人员可能会提出。在这样做的时候，我们的目标是证实我们的立场，即面向案例和面向递归的PER都是严格的，但是在每种范式中，严格性具有不同的性质。
英文摘要：
Case-oriented physics education research - which seeks to refine and develop theory by linking that theory to cases - incorporates distinct practices for selecting data for analysis, generalizing results, and making causal claims. Unanswered questions about these practices may constrain researchers more familiar with the recurrence-oriented research paradigm - which seeks to inform instructional predictions by discerning reproducible, representative patterns and relationships - from participating in or critically engaging with case-oriented research. We use results from interviews with physics education researchers, a synthesis of the literature on research methodologies, and published examples of case-oriented and recurrence-oriented research to answer "hard-hitting questions" that researchers may pose. In doing so, we aim to substantiate our position that both case-oriented and recurrence- oriented PER are rigorous but that the rigor is of a different nature in each paradigm.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
