arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1306.1148cs.NI
收藏

水下无线传感器网络路由协议的比较分析

Comparative Analysis of Routing Protocols for Under Water Wireless Sensor Networks

S. Ahmed, I. U. Khan, M. B. Rasheed, M. Ilahi, R. D. Khan, S. H. Bouk, N. Javaid

摘要:

水下无线传感器网络具有低带宽、高延迟、能量有限、节点浮动移动和高误码率等特点,与陆地传感器网络有很大的不同。这些特点给水下传感器网络的网络协议设计带来了挑战。近年来,已经为这些网络开发了几种路由协议。在比较和验证这些建议的性能方面的主要困难之一是缺乏一个共同的标准来模拟恶劣水下环境中的声传播。在本文中,我们分析了某些水下路由协议,如VBF,DBR,H2-DAB,QELAR等的演变,在他们的本地化技术,能量最小化特性和保持时间计算。每个协议的设计遵循一定的目标,即减少能源消耗,改善通信延迟,实现的鲁棒性和可扩展性等。本文探讨了水下传感器网络的设计和实现的主要方法和挑战。通过对所选协议的详细描述,了解了当前无线传感器网络路由层的研究方向。

英文摘要:

Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks are significantly different from terrestrial sensor networks due to peculiar characteristics of low bandwidth, high latency, limited energy, node float mobility and high error probability. These features bring many challenges to the network protocol design of UWSNs. Several routing protocols have been developed in recent years for these networks. One of the major difficulties in comparison and validation of the performance of these proposals is the lack of a common standard to model the acoustic propagation in the harsh underwater environment. In this paper we analyze the evolution of certain underwater routing protocols like VBF, DBR, H2-DAB, QELAR etc. in terms of their localization techniques, energy minimization characteristics and holding time calculations. The design of each protocol follows certain goals i.e. reduction of energy consumption, improvement of communication latency, achievement of robustness and scalability etc. This paper examines the main approaches and challenges in the design and implementation of underwater sensor networks. The detailed descriptions of the selected protocols contribute in understanding the direction of the current research on routing layer in UWSN.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑