arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1302.6897astro-ph.SR
收藏

重新审视AD775宇宙事件:太阳是罪魁祸首

The AD775 cosmic event revisited: the Sun is to blame

I. G. Usoskin, B. Kromer, F. Ludlow, J. Beer, M. Friedrich, G. A. Kovaltsov, S. K. Solanki, L. Wacker

摘要:

Miyake等人(以下简称M12)最近根据14 C数据报道了一个极端的宇宙事件。公元775年。使用一个简单的模型,M12声称这一事件太强了,不可能是标准理论中的太阳耀斑造成的。这意味着一个新的范例,要么是一个不可能强大的太阳耀斑,要么是一个非常强大的宇宙射线事件的起源不明发生了约。公元775年。我们发现,M12明显高估了事件的强度。随后的一些研究试图为这样的事件找到一个可能的外来源,但它们都是基于M12的错误估计。我们通过分析新的数据集和一致的理论模型来重新审视这一事件。我们使用包括10 Be系列和新测量的14 C年度数据在内的独立数据集验证了AD 775事件的实验结果。我们调查了公元770年代天文观测的历史编年史,以确定极光或超新星的潜在目击。我们使用适当的碳循环模型解释了14 C测量结果。我们证明:(1)新的14 C测量结果证实了AD 775事件的真实性:(2)由于使用了不适当的碳循环模型,M12严重高估了事件的强度;(3)事件的修订幅度与不同的独立数据集一致(14 C,10 Be,36 Cl),并可与强,但不是莫名其妙地强,SEP事件(或一系列事件),并为这种规模的事件提供了第一个证据(注量>30 MeV约为4.5*10^{10} /cm 2);(4)这与历史编年史中确定的极光活动增加一致。这一点可能是太阳事件的起源,这是数千年时间尺度上最大的太阳事件,对太阳和冷恒星爆炸性能量释放的理论提出了强有力的观测约束。

英文摘要:

Miyake et al. (henceforth M12) recently reported, based on 14C data, an extreme cosmic event ca. AD775. Using a simple model, M12 claimed that the event was too strong to be caused by a solar flare within the standard theory. This implied a new paradigm of either an impossibly strong solar flare or a very strong cosmic ray event of unknown origin occurred ca. AD775. We show that the strength of the event was significantly overestimated by M12. Several subsequent works have attempted to find a possible exotic source for such an event, but they are all based on incorrect estimates by M12. We revisit this event with analysis of new datasets and consistent theoretical modelling. We verified the experimental result for the AD775 event using independent datasets including 10Be series and newly measured 14C annual data. We surveyed available historical chronicles for astronomical observations for the AD770s to identify potential sightings of aurorae or supernovae. We interpreted the 14C measurements using an appropriate carbon cycle model. We show that: (1) The reality of the AD775 event is confirmed by new measurements of 14C; (2) by using an inappropriate carbon cycle model, M12 strongly overestimated the event's strength; (3) The revised magnitude of the event is consistent with different independent datasets (14C, 10Be, 36Cl) and can be associated with a strong, but not inexplicably strong, SEP event (or a sequence of events), and provides the first evidence for an event of this magnitude (the fluence >30 MeV was about 4.5*10^{10} /cm2) in multiple datasets; (4) This is in agreement with increased auroral activity identified in historical chronicles. This point to the likely solar origin of the event, which is the greatest solar event on a multi-millennial time scale, placing a strong observational constraint on the theory of explosive energy releases on the Sun and cool stars.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑