arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 1302.5799astro-ph.CO
收藏

从局部形式原始非高斯估计中消除ISW透镜偏差

Removing the ISW-lensing bias from the local-form primordial non-Gaussianity estimation

Jaiseung Kim, Aditya Rotti, Eiichiro Komatsu

摘要:

积分萨克斯-沃尔夫(ISW)效应产生了二次温度各向异性的CMB。主要贡献来自z<2,其中暗能量导致电势衰减。由于相同的光子被这些衰减势引力透镜化,ISW效应和CMB透镜化之间存在高度的相关性,导致所观察到的温度各向异性的非零三点相关性(双谱)。这ISW透镜双谱,其形状类似于所谓的“本地形式”的原始双谱参数化的fNL,被称为是最大的污染fNL。为了避免对原始非高斯性的虚假检测,我们需要去除ISW透镜偏差。在这项工作中,我们研究了三种去偏置方法:(I)减去预期的,系综平均的ISW透镜双谱;(II)减去测量的ISW透镜双谱;和(III)直接减去估计ISW信号从观察到的温度图。可以使用来自外部非CMB数据或来自CMB数据本身的ISW图的估计。由于方法II和方法III基于对暗能量性质的较少假设,因此它们优于方法I。虽然方法I和II产生无偏的估计fNL具有可比的误差条,方法III产生有偏的结果时,底层的原始fNL是非零的和ISW图估计从透镜势重建从观察到的温度图。偏差的来源之一是透镜重建噪声偏差,其独立于fNL并且可以精确计算,但是其他fNL相关项难以可靠地计算。因此,我们得出结论,方法II是最好的,模型无关的方式来消除ISW透镜偏置的fNL,使我们能够测试的物理膨胀较小的系统误差。

英文摘要:

The Integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect produces a secondary temperature anisotropy of CMB. The main contribution comes from z<2, where dark energy leads to a decay of potentials. As the same photons are gravitationally lensed by these decaying potentials, there exists a high degree of correlation between the ISW effect and CMB lensing, leading to a non-zero three-point correlation (bispectrum) of the observed temperature anisotropy. This ISW-lensing bispectrum, whose shape resembles that of the so-called "local-form" primordial bispectrum parametrized by fNL, is known to be the largest contamination of fNL. In order to avoid a spurious detection of primordial non-Gaussianity, we need to remove the ISW-lensing bias. In this work, we investigate three debiasing methods: (I) subtraction of an expected, ensemble average of the ISW-lensing bispectrum; (II) subtraction of a measured ISW-lensing bispectrum; and (III) direct subtraction of an estimated ISW signal from an observed temperature map. One may use an estimation of the ISW map from external non-CMB data or that from the CMB data themselves. As the methods II and III are based on fewer assumptions about the nature of dark energy, they are preferred over the method I. While the methods I and II yield unbiased estimates of fNL with comparable error bars, the method III yields a biased result when the underlying primordial fNL is non-zero and the ISW map is estimated from a lensing potential reconstructed from the observed temperature map. One of the sources of the bias is a lensing reconstruction noise bias which is independent of fNL and can be calculated precisely, but other fNL-dependent terms are difficult to compute reliably. We thus conclude that the method II is the best, model-independent way to remove the ISW-lensing bias of fNL, enabling us to test the physics of inflation with smaller systematic errors.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑