arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1302.1676cs.NI
收藏

基于J-Sim的传感器网络数据分发协议比较

Comparison of Proposed Data Dissemination Protocols for Sensor Networks Using J-Sim

Deepali Virmani, Satbir Jain

摘要:

无线传感器网络的一个显著特点是有机会利用较低层的应用程序的特性。本文报告了使用J-Sim模拟器对无线传感器网络协议进行的拟议数据传播协议的模拟比较结果:转发扩散数据分发(FDDDP)、分散式数据分发(DDDP)、信用广播数据分发(CBDDP),能源感知和地理数据传播(EAGDDP)。我们的性能为网络设计人员提供了有用的见解,例如哪些协议(和设计选择)很好地缩放控制流量、改善数据递送或降低总体能耗、改善路由开销并最大化带宽利用率。DDDP协议对信元大小的静态预配置是导致其路由开销比FDDDP协议平均高74.2%的原因之一。虽然CBDDP产生的开销比DDDP小94.6%,比FDDDP小90.7%,由于CBDDP协议的信用量是静态配置的,因此CBDDP协议平均传输的冗余数据包是DDDP协议和FDDDP协议的7.5倍,EAGDDP协议平均提高了80%的传输效率,并且实现了能量消耗的均衡。学习可以显著提高他们的表现。

英文摘要:

A distinguishing characteristic of wireless sensor networks is the opportunity to exploit characteristics of the application at lower layers. This paper reports on the results of a simulation comparison of proposed data dissemination protocols using the J-Sim simulator for the WSN protocols: Forwarding Diffusion Data Dissemination(FDDDP), Decentralized Data Dissemination(DDDP), Credit Broadcast Data Dissemination (CBDDP), Energy Aware & Geographical Data Dissemination (EAGDDP) .Our performance provides useful insights for the network designer such as which protocols (and design choices) scale control traffic well, improve data delivery or reduce overall energy consumption,improves routing overhead and maximizes the bandwidth utilization. The static pre configuration of the cell size in DDDP, is one of the reasons why DDDP exhibits larger routing overhead than FDDDP by 74.2% on average. Although CBDDP produces approximately 94.6% smaller overhead than DDDP and 90.7% smaller than FDDDP, because of statically configured amount credit CBDDP delivers on average 7.5 times more of the redundant data packets than DDDP and FDDDP.EAGDDP improves the delivery by 80% on average and makes a balance of energy consumption .We suggest that making these protocols truly self-learning can significantly improve their performance.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑