爱因斯坦和埃弗雷特相对论背后的模态实在论
Historical Parallels between, and Modal Realism underlying Einstein and Everett Relativities
摘要：
一个世纪前，“过去”和“未来”，以前严格分开，混合和合并。改进了时间术语。今天，非现实化的量子态，即仅仅是“可能的”替代品，当它们干涉时，客观地“存在”（是真实的）。这两个以前严格不相容的领域再次混合在一起。现在，模态术语是不够的。这两次极端的反应都是从对经验科学的拒斥到神秘整体论。本文展示了如何进展开始与相对化以前的绝对条款，首先通过爱因斯坦的相对论，现在通过埃弗雷特的相对状态描述，这是一个模态现实主义。历史上的相似之处表明，仅仅相对化是不够的。域的变形发生了：确定的过去和依赖的未来被限制在更小的时空区域。这种光锥描述优于超空间叶理，并且已经包含了量子力学的模态实在论。此外，还确定了一个全新的区域，即“绝对别处”。历史先例表明，情态术语可能需要类似的扩展。波普尔对未来不确定性的证明在讨论两种相对性背后的模态现实联系时，转向了粉碎已经存在于许多世界/心灵中的过去，因此埃弗雷特相对性仅仅是违反可能的经验记录之间的相关性的贝尔不等式。
英文摘要：
A century ago, "past" and "future", previously strictly apart, mixed up and merged. Temporal terminology improved. Today, not actualized quantum states, that is merely "possible" alternatives, objectively "exist" (are real) when they interfere. Again, two previously strictly immiscible realms mix. Now, modal terminology is insufficient. Both times, extreme reactions reach from rejection of the empirical science to mystic holism. This paper shows how progress started with the relativization of previously absolute terms, first through Einstein's relativity and now through Everett's relative state description, which is a modal realism. The historical parallels suggest mere relativization is insufficient. A deformation of domains occurs: The determined past and the dependent future were restricted to smaller regions of space-time. This light cone description is superior to hyperspace foliations and already entails the modal realism of quantum mechanics. Moreover, an entirely new region, namely the "absolute elsewhere" was identified. The historical precedent suggests that modal terminology may need a similar extension. Discussing the modal realistic connection underlying both relativities, Popper's proof of future indeterminism is turned to shatter the past already into many worlds/minds, thus Everett relativity is merely the Bell inequality violating correlation between possible empirical records.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
