This paper aims at setting the keystone of a prospective theoretical study on the role of non-monotone interactions in biological regulation networks. Focusing on discrete models of these networks, namely, Boolean automata networks, we propose to analyse the contribution of non-monotony to the diversity and complexity in their dynamical behaviours. More precisely, in this paper, we start by detailing some motivations, both mathematical and biological, for our interest in non-monotony, and we discuss how it may account for phenomena that cannot be produced by monotony only. Then, to build some understanding in this direction, we propose some preliminary results on the dynamical behaviour of some specific non-monotone Boolean automata networks called XOR circulant networks.
This paper details a method for optimising the size of Boolean automata networks in order to compute their attractors under the parallel update schedule. This method relies on the formalism of modules introduced recently that allows for (de)composing such networks. We discuss the practicality of this method by exploring examples. We also propose results that nail the complexity of most parts of the process, while the complexity of one part of the problem is left open.
Boolean automata networks (BANs) are a generalisation of Boolean cellular automata. In such, any theorem describing the way BANs compute information is a strong tool that can be applied to a wide range of models of computation. In this paper we explore a way of working with BANs which involves adding external inputs to the base model (via modules), and more importantly, a way to link networks together using the above mentioned inputs (via wirings). Our aim is to develop a powerful formalism for BAN (de)composition. We formulate two results: the first one shows that our modules/wirings definiti…
Our daily social and political life is more and more impacted by social networks. The functioning of our living bodies is deeply dependent on biological regulation networks such as neural, genetic, and protein networks. And the physical world in which we evolve, is also structured by systems of interacting particles. Interaction networks can be seen in all spheres of existence that concern us, and yet, our understanding of interaction networks remains severely limited by our present lack of both theoretical and applied insight into their clockworks. In the past, efforts at understanding intera…
Automata networks are mappings of the form f : Q Z $\rightarrow$ Q Z , where Q is a finite alphabet and Z is a set of entities; they generalise Cellular Automata and Boolean networks. An update schedule dictates when each entity updates its state according to its local function fi : Q Z $\rightarrow$ Q. One major question is to study the behaviour of a given automata networks under different update schedules. In this paper, we study automata networks that are invariant under many different update schedules. This gives rise to two definitions, locally commutative and globally commu-tative netwo…
This note is a survey of examples and results about cellular automata with the purpose of recalling that there is no 'universal' way of being computationally universal. In particular, we show how some cellular automata can embed efficient but bounded computation, while others can embed unbounded computations but not efficiently. We also study two variants of Boolean circuit embedding, transient versus repeatable simulations, and underline their differences. Finally we show how strong forms of universality can be hidden inside some seemingly simple cellular automata according to some classical …
In automata networks, it is well known that the way entities update their states over time has a major impact on their dynamics. In particular, depending on the chosen update schedule, the underlying dynamical systems may exhibit more or less asymptotic dynamical behaviours such as fixed points or limit cycles. Since such mathematical models have been used in the framework of biological networks modelling, the question of choosing appropriate update schedules has arised soon. In this note, focusing on Boolean networks, our aim is to emphasise that the adequate way of thinking regulations and g…
Modules were introduced as an extension of Boolean automata networks. They have inputs which are used in the computation said modules perform, and can be used to wire modules with each other. In the present paper we extend this new formalism and study the specific case of acyclic modules. These modules prove to be well described in their limit behavior by functions called output functions. We provide other results that offer an upper bound on the number of attractors in an acyclic module when wired recursively into an automata network, alongside a diversity of complexity results around the dif…
CANA: A python package for quantifying control and canalization in Boolean Networks
School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering Indiana University(印第安纳大学信息学、计算与工程学院);CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil(巴西教育部CAPAS基金会);Center for Complex Networks Research, Northeastern University(东北大学复杂网络研究中心)
An automata network is a finite graph where each node holds a state from some finite alphabet and is equipped with an update function that changes its state according to the configuration of neighboring states. More concisely, it is given by a finite map $f:Q^n\rightarrow Q^n$. In this paper we study how some (sets of) automata networks can be simulated by some other (set of) automata networks with prescribed update mode or interaction graph. Our contributions are the following. For non-Boolean alphabets and for any network size, there are intrinsically non-sequential transformations (i.e. tha…