arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1107.4658astro-ph.SR
收藏

估算激变变星距离的三种近红外测光方法的批判性分析

A critical analysis of three near-infrared photometric methods of estimating distances to cataclysmic variables

Michael J. Gariety, F. A. Ringwald

摘要:

对估计灾变变星(CV)距离的三种方法进行了批判性分析。这些方法,由Ak等人,Beuermann和Baugge都使用近红外(JHK或Ks)星等和Barnes-Evans关系。我们比较所有这三种方法的距离测量三角视差由Thorstensen,哈勃太空望远镜,并与HIPPARCOS航天器。我们发现Ak等人的方法对所有CV的总体效果最好,预测的距离平均比三角测量的距离小4%。Beuermann的方法高估了52%的距离。这种方法低估了26%的距离,尽管这只是一个下限,因为它假设所有的光都来自于二级恒星。

英文摘要:

A critical analysis of three methods of estimating distances to cataclysmic variables (CVs) is performed. These methods, by Ak et al., Beuermann, and Knigge, all use near-infrared (JHK or Ks) magnitudes and the Barnes-Evans relation. We compare all three methods to distances measured by trigonometric parallax by Thorstensen, with Hubble Space Telescope, and with the HIPPARCOS spacecraft. We find that the method of Ak et al. works best overall for all CVs, predicting distances on the average 4% less than those measured by trigonometric parallaxes. The method of Beuermann overestimates distances by 52%. The method of Knigge underestimates distances by 26%, although this was only ever meant as a lower limit, since it assumes all light comes from the secondary star.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑