arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1106.2374astro-ph.SRnucl-ex
收藏

关于核衰变率年变化的位相

Concerning the Phases of Annual Variations of Nuclear Decay Rates

Peter A. Sturrock, John B. Buncher, Ephraim Fischbach, Daniel Javorsek, Jere H. Jenkins, Joshua J. Mattes

摘要:

最近对布鲁克海文国家实验室和联邦物理技术研究所获得的数据集进行的分析都显示出明显的年度变化证据,暗示了太阳的影响。然而,衰变率最大值的相位并不完全对应于最小日地距离的相位,这是可以预期的。我们在这里检查的假设,衰变率是由一个未知的太阳辐射的影响,但辐射的强度不仅是由太阳-地球距离的变化,但也可能是南北不对称的太阳辐射机制的影响。我们发现,这可能导致衰变率最大值在0到0.183或0.683到1(9月6日至3月8日)范围内的相位,但根据这一假设,在0.183到0.683(3月8日至9月6日)范围内的相位是“禁止的”。“我们发现这里分析的三个数据集的相位都在允许的范围内。

英文摘要:

Recent analyses of datasets acquired at the Brookhaven National Laboratory and at the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt both show evidence of pronounced annual variations, suggestive of a solar influence. However, the phases of decay-rate maxima do not correspond precisely to the phase of minimum Sun-Earth distance, as might then be expected. We here examine the hypothesis that decay rates are influenced by an unknown solar radiation, but that the intensity of the radiation is influenced not only by the variation in Sun-Earth distance, but also by a possible North-South asymmetry in the solar emission mechanism. We find that this can lead to phases of decay-rate maxima in the range 0 to 0.183 or 0.683 to 1 (September 6 to March 8) but that, according to this hypothesis, phases in the range 0.183 to 0.683 (March 8 to September 6) are "forbidden." We find that phases of the three datasets here analyzed fall in the allowed range.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑