arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1102.4610astro-ph.IMphysics.data-anstat.AP
收藏

解释X射线分析中的校准不一致性:谱拟合中的有效面积

Accounting for Calibration Uncertainties in X-ray Analysis: Effective Areas in Spectral Fitting

Hyunsook Lee, Vinay L. Kashyap, David A. van Dyk, Alanna Connors, Jeremy J. Drake, Rima Izem, Xiao-Li Meng, Shandong Min, Taeyoung Park, Pete Ratzlaff, Aneta Si… 展开作者

Hyunsook Lee, Vinay L. Kashyap, David A. van Dyk, Alanna Connors, Jeremy J. Drake, Rima Izem, Xiao-Li Meng, Shandong Min, Taeyoung Park, Pete Ratzlaff, Aneta Siemiginowska, Andreas Zezas

摘要:

虽然在天文学分析中统计不确定性的考虑已经取得了相当大的进展,但系统的仪器不确定性通常被忽视。这对于正确解释分析结果至关重要,因为仪器校准不确定度是系统不确定度的一种形式。忽略它可能会低估误差线,并将偏差引入模型参数的拟合值。如果使用现有的分析包,目前需要对这种不确定性进行广泛的个案模拟。在这里,我们提出了一般的统计方法,将校准的不确定性纳入高能量数据的光谱分析。我们首先提出了一种基于多重插补的方法,可以应用于任何拟合方法,但必须是近似的。然后,我们描述了一个更精确的贝叶斯方法,结合马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗拟合。我们探讨提高计算效率的方法,特别是详细的方法总结校准不确定性与主成分分析的样本的似是而非的校准文件。这种方法是使用最近编纂的钱德拉有效面积的不确定性低分辨率光谱分析,并验证使用模拟和实际钱德拉数据。我们的程序,将有效面积的不确定性很容易推广到其他类型的校准不确定性。

英文摘要:

While considerable advance has been made to account for statistical uncertainties in astronomical analyses, systematic instrumental uncertainties have been generally ignored. This can be crucial to a proper interpretation of analysis results because instrumental calibration uncertainty is a form of systematic uncertainty. Ignoring it can underestimate error bars and introduce bias into the fitted values of model parameters. Accounting for such uncertainties currently requires extensive case-specific simulations if using existing analysis packages. Here we present general statistical methods that incorporate calibration uncertainties into spectral analysis of high-energy data. We first present a method based on multiple imputation that can be applied with any fitting method, but is necessarily approximate. We then describe a more exact Bayesian approach that works in conjunction with a Markov chain Monte Carlo based fitting. We explore methods for improving computational efficiency, and in particular detail a method of summarizing calibration uncertainties with a principal component analysis of samples of plausible calibration files. This method is implemented using recently codified Chandra effective area uncertainties for low-resolution spectral analysis and is verified using both simulated and actual Chandra data. Our procedure for incorporating effective area uncertainty is easily generalized to other types of calibration uncertainties.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑