arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1010.2836astro-ph.HEhep-ph
收藏

Cosmic ray传播时间尺度:来自放射性核和正电子数据的教训

Cosmic ray propagation time scales: lessons from radioactive nuclei and positron data

Kfir Blum

摘要:

我们重新审视90年代报道的高能放射性核数据和PAMELA最近报道的正电子数据。我们的目的是研究这些数据的传播时间尺度的宇宙射线在银河系中的模型无关的影响。考虑到放射性核,使用衰变电荷衰变电荷比-唯一直接相关的数据在相对论能量-我们表明,刚性独立的停留时间是与观测一致的。所有原子核的数据都可以用f_{s,i} =(t_i/1亿r)^{0.7}来描述,其中f_{s,i}是由于衰变引起的通量抑制,t_i是原子核种类i的观测者坐标系寿命。考虑到正电子的测量,我们认为,正电子流量是符合第二起源。将正电子数据与相同能量范围内的放射性核数据进行比较,我们得出了正电子穿过的平均电磁能量密度的上限,即在刚性R=40 GV时,\bar U_T<1.25 eV/cm ^3。在AMS-02实验范围内的电荷比测量,最值得注意的是Cl/Ar比的测定延伸到R \sim 100 GV,将限制正电子冷却时间的能量依赖性。这种限制可以用来区分不同的传播场景,以及详细测试正电子的次级起源假设。

英文摘要:

We take a fresh look at high energy radioactive nuclei data reported in the 90's and at the positron data recently reported by PAMELA. Our aim is to study the model independent implications of these data for the propagation time scales of cosmic rays in the Galaxy. Considering radioactive nuclei, using decaying charge to decayed charge ratios -- the only directly relevant data available at relativistic energies -- we show that a rigidity independent residence time is consistent with observations. The data for all nuclei can be described by f_{s,i}=(t_i/100 Myr)^{0.7}, where f_{s,i} is the suppression of the flux due to decay and t_i is the observer frame lifetime for nucleus specie i. Considering positron measurements, we argue that the positron flux is consistent with a secondary origin. Comparing the positron data with radioactive nuclei at the same energy range, we derive an upper bound on the mean electromagnetic energy density traversed by the positrons, \bar U_T<1.25 eV/cm^3 at a rigidity of R=40 GV. Charge ratio measurements within easy reach of the AMS-02 experiment, most notably a determination of the Cl/Ar ratio extending up to R\sim100 GV, will constrain the energy dependence of the positron cooling time. Such constraints can be used to distinguish between different propagation scenarios, as well as to test the secondary origin hypothesis for the positrons in detail.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑