arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1008.3296physics.chem-phcond-mat.stat-mech
收藏

Michaelis-Menten-Stueckelberg定理

The Michaelis-Menten-Stueckelberg Theorem

A. N. Gorban, M. Shahzad

摘要:

我们在两个假设下研究具有复杂机制的化学反应:(i)中间体以少量存在(这是准稳态假设或QSS)和(ii)它们与底物处于平衡关系(这是准平衡假设或QE)。在这些假设下,我们证明了广义质量作用定律以及动力学因子之间的基本关系,当细致平衡不适用时,这些关系足以证明熵产生的正性,但即使没有微观可逆性也成立。即使QE和QSS本身产生有用的近似,只有这些假设的组合才能提供超越“稀薄气体”极限或“分子混沌”假设的可能性。我们不使用任何先验形式的动力学定律的化学反应和描述其平衡的热力学关系。中间化合物的转化可以通过马尔可夫动力学来描述,因为它们的密度低({ \em低密度的基本事件})。这种假设组合是由米切里斯和门滕在1913年提出的。在1952年,施图克尔伯格对气体动力学使用了相同的假设,并在玻尔兹曼方程中产生了引人注目的碰撞速率之间的半细致平衡关系,该关系比细致平衡条件弱,但仍然足以使玻尔兹曼$H$定理有效。我们的结果是在Michaelis-Menten-Stueckelbeg的概念框架内得到的。

英文摘要:

We study chemical reactions with complex mechanisms under two assumptions: (i) intermediates are present in small amounts (this is the quasi-steady-state hypothesis or QSS) and (ii) they are in equilibrium relations with substrates (this is the quasiequilibrium hypothesis or QE). Under these assumptions, we prove the generalized mass action law together with the basic relations between kinetic factors, which are sufficient for the positivity of the entropy production but hold even without microreversibility, when the detailed balance is not applicable. Even though QE and QSS produce useful approximations by themselves, only the combination of these assumptions can render the possibility beyond the "rarefied gas" limit or the "molecular chaos" hypotheses. We do not use any a priori form of the kinetic law for the chemical reactions and describe their equilibria by thermodynamic relations. The transformations of the intermediate compounds can be described by the Markov kinetics because of their low density ({\em low density of elementary events}). This combination of assumptions was introduced by Michaelis and Menten in 1913. In 1952, Stueckelberg used the same assumptions for the gas kinetics and produced the remarkable semi-detailed balance relations between collision rates in the Boltzmann equation that are weaker than the detailed balance conditions but are still sufficient for the Boltzmann $H$-theorem to be valid. Our results are obtained within the Michaelis-Menten-Stueckelbeg conceptual framework.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑