arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1007.4453physics.bio-ph
收藏

内聚群体中的集体决策

Collective decision making in cohesive flocks

K. Bhattacharya, Tamás Vicsek

摘要:

我们中的大多数人一定都被集体移动的动物的引人注目的展示所吸引。鱼群可以以相当有序的方式移动,然后惊人地突然改变方向。在生物世界和非生物世界中,还有大量的其他例子可以证明,在这些现象中,许多相互作用的、永久运动的单元似乎在很短的时间内就达到了一种共同的行为模式。作为这种类型的现象的范例,我们考虑的问题,鸟类如何达成一个决定,导致他们同步着陆。我们引入一个简单的模型来解释这个过程。着陆前的集体运动采用一种新的边界条件的简单的自推进粒子(SPP)系统来模拟,而着陆意图的趋势和突然传播则通过类似于外场中的随机场伊辛模型的规则来引入.我们表明,我们的方法是能够捕捉最相关的功能,集体决策的单位系统与个人的意图的变化,并在越来越大的压力下切换状态。我们发现,作为我们的模型的几个参数的函数,从飞行到着陆状态的集体切换确实比个人着陆意图的分布要尖锐得多。本报告讨论了伴随这一过渡而来的一些有趣的特点。

英文摘要:

Most of us must have been fascinated by the eye catching displays of collectively moving animals. Schools of fish can move in a rather orderly fashion and then change direction amazingly abruptly. There are a huge number of further examples both from the living and the non-living world for phenomena during which the many interacting, permanently moving units seem to arrive at a common behavioural pattern taking place in a short time. As a paradigm of this type of phenomena we consider the problem of how birds arrive at a decision resulting in their synchronized landing. We introduce a simple model to interpret this process. Collective motion prior to landing is modelled using a simple self-propelled particle (SPP) system with a new kind of boundary condition, while the tendency and the sudden propagation of the intention of landing is introduced through rules analogous to the random field Ising model in an external field. We show that our approach is capable of capturing the most relevant features of collective decision making in a system of units with a variance of individual intentions and being under an increasing level of pressure to switch states. We find that as a function of the few parameters of our model the collective switching from the flying to the landing state is indeed much sharper than the distribution of the individual landing intentions. The transition is accompanied by a number of interesting features discussed in this report.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑