arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1003.0064cs.ITmath.ITmath.NT
收藏

抽样译码:有界距离译码的随机格型算法

Decoding by Sampling: A Randomized Lattice Algorithm for Bounded Distance Decoding

Shuiyin Liu, Cong Ling, Damien Stehlé

摘要:

尽管其降低了复杂度,格约简辅助解码表现出越来越大的差距,最大似然(ML)的性能,随着维数的增加。为了提高其性能,本文提出了基于Klein抽样技术的随机格型解码,这是Babai最近平面算法(即,连续干扰消除(SIC))。为了找到最接近的格点,克莱因算法被用来采样一些格点,并选择这些样本中最接近的。格点缩减增加了找到最近格点的概率,并且在预处理期间仅需要运行一次。此外,采样可以非常有效地并行操作。本文的技术贡献是双重的:我们分析和优化的采样解码的解码半径,从而产生更好的错误性能比克莱因的原始算法,并提出了一个非常有效的实现随机舍入。特别令人感兴趣的是,与Babai的解码相比,可以在多项式复杂度下实现解码半径的固定增益。所提出的解码器是有用的中等尺寸的球形解码变得计算密集型,而格约简辅助解码开始遭受相当大的损失。仿真结果表明,接近ML的性能是通过适度数量的样本,即使是高达32的维度。

英文摘要:

Despite its reduced complexity, lattice reduction-aided decoding exhibits a widening gap to maximum-likelihood (ML) performance as the dimension increases. To improve its performance, this paper presents randomized lattice decoding based on Klein's sampling technique, which is a randomized version of Babai's nearest plane algorithm (i.e., successive interference cancelation (SIC)). To find the closest lattice point, Klein's algorithm is used to sample some lattice points and the closest among those samples is chosen. Lattice reduction increases the probability of finding the closest lattice point, and only needs to be run once during pre-processing. Further, the sampling can operate very efficiently in parallel. The technical contribution of this paper is two-fold: we analyze and optimize the decoding radius of sampling decoding resulting in better error performance than Klein's original algorithm, and propose a very efficient implementation of random rounding. Of particular interest is that a fixed gain in the decoding radius compared to Babai's decoding can be achieved at polynomial complexity. The proposed decoder is useful for moderate dimensions where sphere decoding becomes computationally intensive, while lattice reduction-aided decoding starts to suffer considerable loss. Simulation results demonstrate near-ML performance is achieved by a moderate number of samples, even if the dimension is as high as 32.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑