arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1003.0001astro-ph.COgr-qc
收藏

利用当前宇宙学观测探索广义相对论的修正

Probing modifications of General Relativity using current cosmological observations

Gong-Bo Zhao, Tommaso Giannantonio, Levon Pogosian, Alessandra Silvestri, David J. Bacon, Kazuya Koyama, Robert C. Nichol, Yong-Seon Song

摘要:

我们使用当前的宇宙学数据来检验广义相对论(GR):WMAP 5观测到宇宙微波背景(Komatsu等人,2009年),来自CMB与六个星系目录交叉相关的综合萨克斯-沃尔夫(ISW)效应(Giannantonio等人,2008年),Ia型超新星(SNe)的汇编,包括最新的SDSS SNe(Kessler等人,2009年),以及CFHTLS(Fu等人,2008年,Kilbinger等人,2009年)的部分弱透镜(WL)数据,这些数据探测线性和轻度非线性尺度。我们首先测试一个模型,其中有效的牛顿常数,μ,和两个引力势的比率,η,在后期从GR值过渡到另一个常数;在这种情况下,我们发现标准GR与组合数据完全一致。最强的约束来自ISW效应,这将产生于这种引力过渡;所观察到的ISW信号对表征透镜效应的μ和eta的组合施加了严格的约束。接下来,我们考虑每个函数mu和eta在时间和空间上的四个像素,并执行主成分分析(PCA),发现所得到的八个本征模中的七个在误差范围内与GR一致。只有一个本征模式显示2西格玛偏离GR预测,这可能是由于系统性的影响。然而,这种偏差的检测表明,当结合结构形成和膨胀历史的观察来测试GR时,我们的时间和尺度依赖的PCA方法的能力。

英文摘要:

We test General Relativity (GR) using current cosmological data: the cosmic microwave background (CMB) from WMAP5 (Komatsu et al. 2009), the integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect from the cross-correlation of the CMB with six galaxy catalogs (Giannantonio et al. 2008), a compilation of supernovae Type Ia (SNe) including the latest SDSS SNe (Kessler et al. 2009), and part of the weak lensing (WL) data from CFHTLS (Fu et al. 2008, Kilbinger et al. 2009) that probe linear and mildly non-linear scales. We first test a model where the effective Newton's constant, mu, and the ratio of the two gravitational potentials, eta, transit from the GR value to another constant at late times; in this case, we find that standard GR is fully consistent with the combined data. The strongest constraint comes from the ISW effect which would arise from this gravitational transition; the observed ISW signal imposes a tight constraint on a combination of mu and eta that characterizes the lensing potential. Next, we consider four pixels in time and space for each function mu and eta, and perform a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) finding that seven of the resulting eight eigenmodes are consistent with GR within the errors. Only one eigenmode shows a 2-sigma deviation from the GR prediction, which is likely to be due to a systematic effect. However, the detection of such a deviation demonstrates the power of our time- and scale-dependent PCA methodology when combining observations of structure formation and expansion history to test GR.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑