我国社科期刊传播结构比较研究
A comparative study on communication structures of Chinese journals in the social sciences
摘要：
我们认为，中国社会科学的传播结构还没有得到充分的改革。对我国马克思主义与政治学、图书情报学、经济学三个学科领域的国内期刊与国际期刊的引文模式进行了比较。与自然科学和生命科学领域的同行一样，中国社会科学领域的学者提供的期刊参考文献比国际同行少;与国际同行一样，社会科学家提供的参考文献比自然科学领域少。因此，由此产生的引文网络是稀疏的。然而，引文结构清楚地表明，中国社会科学在学科划分方面远不如国际同行专业化。在中国，马克思主义研究比政治学更成熟。就中国政治制度对学术领域的影响而言，与政治制度密切相关的学科的专业化程度低于与政治制度弱相关的学科。在讨论部分，我们探讨了可能导致当前停滞的原因，并提出了政策建议。
英文摘要：
We argue that the communication structures in the Chinese social sciences have not yet been sufficiently reformed. Citation patterns among Chinese domestic journals in three subject areas -- political science and marxism, library and information science, and economics -- are compared with their counterparts internationally. Like their colleagues in the natural and life sciences, Chinese scholars in the social sciences provide fewer references to journal publications than their international counterparts; like their international colleagues, social scientists provide fewer references than natural sciences. The resulting citation networks, therefore, are sparse. Nevertheless, the citation structures clearly suggest that the Chinese social sciences are far less specialized in terms of disciplinary delineations than their international counterparts. Marxism studies are more established than political science in China. In terms of the impact of the Chinese political system on academic fields, disciplines closely related to the political system are less specialized than those weakly related. In the discussion section, we explore reasons that may cause the current stagnation and provide policy recommendations.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
