arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1002.2132astro-ph.SR
收藏

g模式频率对脉动代码及其参数的敏感性

Sensitivity of the g-mode frequencies to pulsation codes and their parameters

A. Moya, S. Mathur, R. A. Garcia

摘要:

从演化和地震工具活动(ESTA,Lebreton等人,2006年; Monteiro等人,2008年)最近的工作来看,其任务2致力于比较使用大部分在星震界可用的脉冲代码计算的脉冲频率,理论频率与非物理选择的依赖性现在已经相当固定。为了保证计算频率的精度与观测误差在同一数量级或更好,必须遵循平衡模型和脉动方程数值分辨率的一些要求。特别是,我们已经验证了与Saclay地震模型,这是用来研究太阳能g模式区域(60至140 $μ$ Hz)获得的数值精度。我们比较了来自奥胡斯绝热脉动代码(ADIPLS)的结果,与格拉纳达代码(GraCo)计算的频率,考虑到几种可能的选择。我们的结论是,目前的平衡模型和Richardson外推法的使用,确保了$0.01 μHz$的顺序在确定的频率,这是完全足够的我们的目的的精度。

英文摘要:

From the recent work of the Evolution and Seismic Tools Activity (ESTA, Lebreton et al. 2006; Monteiro et al. 2008), whose Task 2 is devoted to compare pulsational frequencies computed using most of the pulsational codes available in the asteroseismic community, the dependence of the theoretical frequencies with non-physical choices is now quite well fixed. To ensure that the accuracy of the computed frequencies is of the same order of magnitude or better than the observational errors, some requirements in the equilibrium models and the numerical resolutions of the pulsational equations must be followed. In particular, we have verified the numerical accuracy obtained with the Saclay seismic model, which is used to study the solar g-mode region (60 to 140$μ$Hz). We have compared the results coming from the Aarhus adiabatic pulsation code (ADIPLS), with the frequencies computed with the Granada Code (GraCo) taking into account several possible choices. We have concluded that the present equilibrium models and the use of the Richardson extrapolation ensure an accuracy of the order of $0.01 μHz$ in the determination of the frequencies, which is quite enough for our purposes.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑