arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1001.4359hep-ph
收藏

在LHC上pp碰撞中奇异产生的展望

Prospects for Strangeness Production in pp Collisions at LHC

I. Kraus, J. Cleymans, H. Oeschler, K. Redlich

摘要:

在统计模型的范围内讨论了在大型强子对撞机(LHC)pp碰撞奇异产生的前景。首先,系统的大小和能量依赖的模型参数提取从现有的数据和外推到LHC的能量。特别注意的是,证明化学解耦温度是独立的系统的大小。在迄今为止所研究的能量范围内,pp相互作用中奇异态的产生受到正则抑制效应的强烈影响。在LHC能量下,这种影响可能会减少。粒子比例与典型的影响特别敏感。其次,研究了pp相互作用中奇异产生与带电粒子多重数的关系。在这种情况下,在Tevatron研究的多重性依赖是特别感兴趣的。在那里,从中心依赖的重离子碰撞中已知的相对奇异性产生的趋势在多重选择pp相互作用中是看不到的。然而,从Tevatron测量的结论是基于相当有限的数据样本与低统计和可观测的数量。我们认为,有一个绝对需要在大型强子对撞机测量奇异生产在不同的多重性事件可能解开PP和重离子碰撞粒子生产之间的关系和差异。

英文摘要:

Prospects for strangeness production in pp collisions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) are discussed within the statistical model. Firstly, the system size and the energy dependence of the model parameters are extracted from existing data and extrapolated to LHC energy. Particular attention is paid to demonstrate that the chemical decoupling temperature is independent of the system size. In the energy regime investigated so far, strangeness production in pp interactions is strongly influenced by the canonical suppression effects. At LHC energies, this influence might be reduced. Particle ratios with particular sensitivity to canonical effects are indicated. Secondly, the relation between the strangeness production and the charged-particle multiplicity in pp interactions is investigated. In this context the multiplicity dependence studied at Tevatron is of particular interest. There, the trend in relative strangeness production known from centrality dependent heavy-ion collisions is not seen in multiplicity selected pp interactions. However, the conclusion from the Tevatron measurements is based on rather limited data samples with low statistics and number of observables. We argue, that there is an absolute need at LHC to measure strangeness production in events with different multiplicities to possibly disentangle relations and differences between particle production in pp and heavy-ion collisions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑