过去的表现作为成功的资助申请的预测因素：一项案例研究
Past Performance as Predictor of Successful Grant Applications: A Case Study
摘要：
竞争性分配研究经费是科学系统内的一种主要机制。它基本上是基于同行审查的思想。同行评审是项目选择的核心，因为同行被认为处于独特的地位，可以识别和选择最好和最具创新性的研究人员和研究项目。在这项研究中，我们评估的做法，同行评议为基础的项目选择。最基本的问题是“最好的研究人员能得到资助吗？”换句话说，基于同行审查的质量指标是否能预测获得资助的成功？下一个要回答的问题是关于同行评审。同行评议者是否确实认可最好的研究人员，随后，研究委员会的决定是否基于同行评议的结果？最后，我们回答了其他因素是否影响获得资助的概率的问题，如共同申请人的作用，性别的影响，以及应用程序的学科的影响。
英文摘要：
Competitive allocation of research funding is a major mechanism within the science system. It is fundamentally based on the idea of peer review. Peer review is central in project selection as peers are considered to be in a unique position to identify and select the best and most innovative researchers and research projects. In this study, we assess the practice of peer-review based project selection. The basic question is "do the best researchers get the funding"? In other words, do peer review based quality indicators predict success in receiving funding? The next question to be answered is about the peer review. Do peer reviewers indeed recognize the best researchers, and subsequently, is the decision of the research council based on the outcomes of peer review? Finally, we answer the question whether other factors influence the probability of receiving funding, such as the role of co-applicants, the effects of gender, and the effect of the discipline of the application.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
