arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0908.3615math.STstat.TH
收藏

模型选择后的条件预测推理

Conditional predictive inference post model selection

Hannes Leeb

摘要:

本文对随机设计回归模型选择后的预测推理过程进行了有限样本分析。分析的重点是一个统计上具有挑战性的情况下,潜在的重要的解释变量的数量可以是无限的,没有规律性的条件施加在未知参数,在一个“好”的模型中的解释变量的数量可以是相同的顺序为样本量和候选模型的数量可以是更大的顺序比样本量。推理过程的性能是在训练样本的条件下评估的。在弱条件下,只有候选模型的数量和它们的复杂性,并一致地在所有的数据生成过程中考虑,我们表明,一定的预测区间是近似有效的和短的概率在有限的样本,在其实际覆盖概率接近标称覆盖概率的意义上,以及在其长度接近不可行区间的长度的意义上,通过实际了解“最佳”候选模型来构建。类似的结果被证明适用于预测推理程序,而不是预测区间,例如,测试未来的响应是否会高于或低于给定的阈值。

英文摘要:

We give a finite-sample analysis of predictive inference procedures after model selection in regression with random design. The analysis is focused on a statistically challenging scenario where the number of potentially important explanatory variables can be infinite, where no regularity conditions are imposed on unknown parameters, where the number of explanatory variables in a "good" model can be of the same order as sample size and where the number of candidate models can be of larger order than sample size. The performance of inference procedures is evaluated conditional on the training sample. Under weak conditions on only the number of candidate models and on their complexity, and uniformly over all data-generating processes under consideration, we show that a certain prediction interval is approximately valid and short with high probability in finite samples, in the sense that its actual coverage probability is close to the nominal one and in the sense that its length is close to the length of an infeasible interval that is constructed by actually knowing the "best" candidate model. Similar results are shown to hold for predictive inference procedures other than prediction intervals like, for example, tests of whether a future response will lie above or below a given threshold.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑