arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0905.4503astro-ph.CO
收藏

z<0.8的星系团静止标架光学光度函数和星系团Red序列的组装

The Rest-Frame Optical Luminosity Function of Cluster Galaxies at z<0.8 and the Assembly of the Cluster Red Sequence

Gregory Rudnick, Anja von der Linden, Roser Pello, Alfonso Aragon-Salamanca, Danilo Marchesini, Douglas Clowe, Gabriella De Lucia, Claire Halliday, Pascale Jabl… 展开作者

Gregory Rudnick, Anja von der Linden, Roser Pello, Alfonso Aragon-Salamanca, Danilo Marchesini, Douglas Clowe, Gabriella De Lucia, Claire Halliday, Pascale Jablonka, Bo Milvang-Jensen, Bianca Poggianti, Roberto Saglia, Luc Simard, Simon White, Dennis Zaritsky

摘要:

本文给出了ESO遥远星系团巡天(EDisCS)中16个0.4<z<0.8的红序星系的静止标架光学光度函数(LF)。我们将我们的集群与斯隆数字巡天(SDSS)的类似样本进行比较,并将EDisCS集群与其最有可能的后代进行匹配。我们将所有LF测量到M M* +(2.5 - 3.5)。在z<0.8时,LF的亮端与被动演化一致,但红色序列的暗端向较低的红移显著增加。有一个弱的依赖性的LF对集群速度色散EDisCS,但没有这样的依赖性的SDSS集群。我们发现初步的证据表明,红序列星系亮度超过阈值的星等已经到位,这个阈值演变到微弱的幅度向较低的红移。我们比较了EDisCS的LF和同时代红序列星系的LF,发现亮端的LF是一致的。然而,相对于明亮的红色星系的数量,在0.6<z<0.8的区域中,暗红色星系比星系团多,但在0.4<z<0.6的区域中,暗红色星系比星系团少,这意味着差异演化。我们将EDisCS簇红色序列中的总光与我们的SDSS簇样本中的总红色序列光进行比较。0.4<z<0.8的星系团在红色序列上的光度(以及红色星系中的恒星质量)必须在z=0时增加1-3倍。必要的过程,增加质量的红色序列在集群预测本地集群是过度发光相比,在SDSS中观察到的。预测的集群光度可以调和与观察到的本地集群光度相结合的多个先前已知的效果。

英文摘要:

We present the rest-frame optical luminosity function (LF) of red sequence galaxies in 16 clusters at 0.4<z<0.8 drawn from the ESO Distant Cluster Survey (EDisCS). We compare our clusters to an analogous sample from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and match the EDisCS clusters to their most likely descendants. We measure all LFs down to M M* + (2.5 - 3.5). At z<0.8, the bright end of the LF is consistent with passive evolution but there is a significant build-up of the faint end of the red sequence towards lower redshift. There is a weak dependence of the LF on cluster velocity dispersion for EDisCS but no such dependence for the SDSS clusters. We find tentative evidence that red sequence galaxies brighter than a threshold magnitude are already in place, and that this threshold evolves to fainter magnitudes toward lower redshifts. We compare the EDisCS LFs with the LF of co-eval red sequence galaxies in the field and find that the bright end of the LFs agree. However, relative to the number of bright red galaxies, the field has more faint red galaxies than clusters at 0.6<z<0.8 but fewer at 0.4<z<0.6, implying differential evolution. We compare the total light in the EDisCS cluster red sequences to the total red sequence light in our SDSS cluster sample. Clusters at 0.4<z<0.8 must increase their luminosity on the red sequence (and therefore stellar mass in red galaxies) by a factor of 1-3 by z=0. The necessary processes that add mass to the red sequence in clusters predict local clusters that are over-luminous as compared to those observed in the SDSS. The predicted cluster luminosities can be reconciled with observed local cluster luminosities by combining multiple previously known effects.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑