arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0904.0337astro-ph.GA
收藏

SN 2008 ax的23 GHz VLBI观测

23 GHz VLBI Observations of SN 2008ax

I. Marti-Vidal, J. M. Marcaide, A. Alberdi, J. C. Guirado, M. A. Perez-Torres, E. Ros, I. I. Shapiro, R. J. Beswick, T. W. B. Muxlow, A. Pedlar, M. K. Argo, S. … 展开作者

I. Marti-Vidal, J. M. Marcaide, A. Alberdi, J. C. Guirado, M. A. Perez-Torres, E. Ros, I. I. Shapiro, R. J. Beswick, T. W. B. Muxlow, A. Pedlar, M. K. Argo, S. Immler, N. Panagia, C. J. Stockdale, R. A. Sramek, S. Van Dyk, K. W. Weiler

摘要:

我们报告的相位参考23 GHz甚长基线干涉(VLBI)的IIb型超新星SN 2008ax的观测,与甚长基线阵列(VLBA)在2008年4月2日(爆炸后33天)。这些观测结果导致了超新星的边缘探测。从我们的VLBI图像恢复的总通量密度为0.8 $\pm$ 0.3毫焦耳(一个标准差)。正如它出现的那样,该结构可以解释为核心射流或双源。然而,超新星的结构可能会与可能的噪音峰混淆。在这种情况下,恢复的通量密度将减少到0.48 $\pm$ 0.12毫焦耳,与VLA在接近我们VLBI观测的时期测量的通量密度相一致。从我们的观测中得到的最低平均膨胀速度是$(1.90 \pm 0.30) \times 10^5$ km·s $^{-1}$(双源情况)和$(5.2 \pm 1.3) \times 10^4$ km·s $^{-1}$(将较弱的源分量视为附近的虚假噪声峰,这是更可能的解释)。这些速度分别是7.3倍和2倍,比最大喷出物的速度推断从光学线观测。

英文摘要:

We report on phase-referenced 23 GHz Very-Long-Baseline-Interferometry (VLBI) observations of the type IIb supernova SN 2008ax, made with the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) on 2 April 2008 (33 days after explosion). These observations resulted in a marginal detection of the supernova. The total flux density recovered from our VLBI image is 0.8$\pm$0.3 mJy (one standard deviation). As it appears, the structure may be interpreted as either a core-jet or a double source. However, the supernova structure could be somewhat confused with a possible close by noise peak. In such a case, the recovered flux density would decrease to 0.48$\pm$0.12 mJy, compatible with the flux densities measured with the VLA at epochs close in time to our VLBI observations. The lowest average expansion velocities derived from our observations are $(1.90 \pm 0.30) \times 10^5$ km s$^{-1}$ (case of a double source) and $(5.2 \pm 1.3) \times 10^4$ km s$^{-1}$ (taking the weaker source component as a spurious, close by, noise peak, which is the more likely interpretation). These velocities are 7.3 and 2 times higher, respectively, than the maximum ejecta velocity inferred from optical-line observations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑