arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 0902.0990stat.MEstat.AP
收藏

基于最近邻列联表的方向聚类测试

Directional Clustering Tests Based on Nearest Neighbor Contingency Tables

Elvan Ceyhan

摘要:

两个或多个纲或物种之间的空间相互作用在各个领域都有重要的意义,并导致多元模式,如分离或关联。当一个纲或物种的成员更有可能被发现靠近同一纲或同种的成员时,就会发生分离;而当一个纲或物种的成员更有可能被发现靠近另一个纲或物种的成员时,就会发生联合。所考虑的空模式是来自两个或多个类的点的随机标记(RL)和完全空间随机性(CSR),以下称为\emph{CSR independence}。文献中使用的基于最近邻列联表(NNCT)的聚类检验是双侧检验。在这篇文章中,我们考虑方向(即,单侧)版本的细胞特异性NNCT测试,并引入新的方向NNCT测试的两类情况。我们分析的分布特性,比较经验的显着水平和经验的权力估计的测试,使用广泛的蒙特卡罗模拟。我们证明了新的方向性测试具有与目前可用的NNCT测试在经验大小和功率方面相当的性能。我们使用四个示例数据集进行说明,并提供使用这些NNCT测试的指导方针。

英文摘要:

Spatial interaction between two or more classes or species has important implications in various fields and causes multivariate patterns such as segregation or association. Segregation occurs when members of a class or species are more likely to be found near members of the same class or conspecifics; while association occurs when members of a class or species are more likely to be found near members of another class or species. The null patterns considered are random labeling (RL) and complete spatial randomness (CSR) of points from two or more classes, which is called \emph{CSR independence}, henceforth. The clustering tests based on nearest neighbor contingency tables (NNCTs) that are in use in literature are two-sided tests. In this article, we consider the directional (i.e., one-sided) versions of the cell-specific NNCT-tests and introduce new directional NNCT-tests for the two-class case. We analyze the distributional properties; compare the empirical significant levels and empirical power estimates of the tests using extensive Monte Carlo simulations. We demonstrate that the new directional tests have comparable performance with the currently available NNCT-tests in terms of empirical size and power. We use four example data sets for illustrative purposes and provide guidelines for using these NNCT-tests.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑