arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0810.0758stat.MEstat.AP
收藏

基于最近邻列联表的类间分离检验

Class-Specific Tests of Spatial Segregation Based on Nearest Neighbor Contingency Tables

Elvan Ceyhan

摘要:

两个或多个纲(或种)之间的空间相互作用在许多领域具有重要的影响,并可能导致多变量聚类模式,如分离或关联。当一个类的成员倾向于在同一类的成员附近被发现时(即,同类),而当一个类的成员往往被发现接近其他类或类的成员时,则发生关联。这些模式可以使用最近邻列联表(NNCT)进行测试。原假设是最近邻(NN)结构中的随机性,这可能是由来自两个或多个类的点的随机标记(RL)或完全空间随机性(CSR)(以下称为CSR独立性)等模式引起的。在这篇文章中,我们考虑了Dixon的类特定的隔离测试,并介绍了一个新的类特定的测试,这是一个新的分解Dixon的整体卡方隔离统计量。我们证明,我们考虑的测试提供了不同方面的类之间的空间相互作用的信息,它们是有条件的CSR独立模式下,但不是RL模式下。我们分析了分布特性,并证明了这些测试的一致性,比较经验显著性水平(第一类错误率)和经验功率估计的测试,使用蒙特卡罗模拟。我们证明,新的类特定的测试也有相当的性能与目前可用的测试的基础上NNCT的第一类错误和功率估计。为了说明的目的,我们使用三个示例数据集。我们还提供了使用这些测试的指南。

英文摘要:

The spatial interaction between two or more classes (or species) has important consequences in many fields and might cause multivariate clustering patterns such as segregation or association. The spatial pattern of segregation occurs when members of a class tend to be found near members of the same class (i.e., conspecifics), while association occurs when members of a class tend to be found near members of the other class or classes. These patterns can be tested using a nearest neighbor contingency table (NNCT). The null hypothesis is randomness in the nearest neighbor (NN) structure, which may result from -- among other patterns -- random labeling (RL) or complete spatial randomness (CSR) of points from two or more classes (which is called the CSR independence, henceforth). In this article, we consider Dixon's class-specific tests of segregation and introduce a new class-specific test, which is a new decomposition of Dixon's overall chi-square segregation statistic. We demonstrate that the tests we consider provide information on different aspects of the spatial interaction between the classes and they are conditional under the CSR independence pattern, but not under the RL pattern. We analyze the distributional properties and prove the consistency of these tests; compare the empirical significant levels (Type I error rates) and empirical power estimates of the tests using Monte Carlo simulations. We demonstrate that the new class-specific tests also have comparable performance with the currently available tests based on NNCTs in terms of Type I error and power estimates. For illustrative purposes, we use three example data sets. We also provide guidelines for using these tests.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑