arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 0809.4041astro-ph
收藏

100 Mpc/h尺度上的相容大宇宙流:对标准LCDM宇宙学的挑战

Consistently Large Cosmic Flows on Scales of 100 Mpc/h: a Challenge for the Standard LCDM Cosmology

Richard Watkins, Hume A. Feldman, Michael J. Hudson

摘要:

特殊的速度调查有不均匀的空间分布的示踪剂,因此,从他们估计的整体流量不对应于一个简单的体积,如一个球体。因此,总体流量估计值在不同的调查之间一般不具有严格的可比性,即使是有效深度相似的调查也是如此。此外,典型调查的稀疏性可能导致小尺度功率混叠成意味着是最大尺度的探测。在这里,我们介绍了一种新的方法来计算体积流量的时刻,速度加权给出一个理想化的调查的体积流量的最佳估计,估计和实际流量之间的差异的方差最小化。这些“最小方差”估计值可以设计成以对小尺度功率的最小敏感性来估计特定尺度上的总体流量,并且在调查之间是可比较的。我们汇编了所有主要的特殊速度调查,并将这种新方法应用于它们。我们发现,我们研究的大多数调查彼此高度一致。总之,数据表明,在半径为50 Mpc/h的高斯窗口内的整体流为407 km/s,朝向l=287和b=8。大规模的整体运动是一致的预测从当地的密度场。这表明在非常大的尺度上存在显著的密度波动。在WMAP 5标准化的LCDM宇宙学中,这种幅度的流动在如此大的尺度上是不被期望的,因此预测的一维r.m.s.速度约为110 km/s。所观察到的整体流量的大幅度有利于WMAP 5误差椭圆的上限值,但即使是WMAP 5 95%置信度椭圆顶部的点预测的整体流量与在>98%置信度水平下观察到的整体流量相比也太低。

英文摘要:

Peculiar velocity surveys have non-uniform spatial distributions of tracers, so that the bulk flow estimated from them does not correspond to that of a simple volume such as a sphere. Thus bulk flow estimates are generally not strictly comparable between surveys, even those whose effective depths are similar. In addition, the sparseness of typical surveys can lead to aliasing of small scale power into what is meant to be a probe of the largest scales. Here we introduce a new method of calculating bulk flow moments where velocities are weighted to give an optimal estimate of the bulk flow of an idealized survey, with the variance of the difference between the estimate and the actual flow being minimized. These "minimum variance" estimates can be designed to estimate the bulk flow on a particular scale with minimal sensitivity to small scale power, and are comparable between surveys. We compile all major peculiar velocity surveys and apply this new method to them. We find that most surveys we studied are highly consistent with each other. Taken together the data suggest that the bulk flow within a Gaussian window of radius 50 Mpc/h is 407 km/s toward l=287 and b=8. The large-scale bulk motion is consistent with predictions from the local density field. This indicates that there are significant density fluctuations on very large scales. A flow of this amplitude on such a large scale is not expected in the WMAP5-normalized LCDM cosmology, for which the predicted one-dimensional r.m.s. velocity is ~110 km/s. The large amplitude of the observed bulk flow favors the upper values of the WMAP5 error-ellipse, but even the point at the top of the WMAP5 95% confidence ellipse predicts a bulk flow which is too low compared to that observed at >98% confidence level.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑