arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0806.3156hep-phhep-exhep-lat
收藏

α_s和τ强子宽度:固定阶、轮廓改进和高阶微扰理论

alpha_s and the tau hadronic width: fixed-order, contour-improved and higher-order perturbation theory

Martin Beneke, Matthias Jamin

摘要:

从强子$τ$衰变的$α_s$的测定是重新审视,特别强调高阶微扰修正的问题和不同的可能性的重新正规化群的微扰系列:固定阶(FOPT)与轮廓改进的微扰理论(CIPT)。这些方法之间的差异已经演变成一种系统效应,这种效应不会随着微扰膨胀中高阶的增加而消失。我们试图澄清在何种情况下,一种或另一种方法提供了一个更好的近似的真实结果。为此,我们建议描述的阿德勒函数系列的模型,其中包括确切已知的系数和理论约束的大的顺序行为起源于算子乘积展开和重整化组。在这个框架内,我们发现,虽然CIPT是无法解释的充分的mammed系列,FOPT顺利接近博雷尔和,在预期的发散行为集在更高的订单。在$\MSb$方案中,利用五阶FOPT确定$α_s$,得到$α_s(M_τ)=0.320 {}^{+0.012}_{-0.007}$,对应于$α_s(M_Z) = 0.1185 {}^{+0.0014}_{-0.0009}$ .通过包括来自我们的模型的更高阶来改进该结果,产生$α_s(M_τ)=0.316 \pm 0.006$,其在进化之后导致$α_s(M_Z) = 0.1180 \pm 0.0008$。我们的结果低于以前的值从$τ$衰变。

英文摘要:

The determination of $α_s$ from hadronic $τ$ decays is revisited, with a special emphasis on the question of higher-order perturbative corrections and different possibilities of resumming the perturbative series with the renormalisation group: fixed-order (FOPT) vs. contour-improved perturbation theory (CIPT). The difference between these approaches has evolved into a systematic effect that does not go away as higher orders in the perturbative expansion are added. We attempt to clarify under which circumstances one or the other approach provides a better approximation to the true result. To this end, we propose to describe the Adler function series by a model that includes the exactly known coefficients and theoretical constraints on the large-order behaviour originating from the operator product expansion and the renormalisation group. Within this framework we find that while CIPT is unable to account for the fully resummed series, FOPT smoothly approaches the Borel sum, before the expected divergent behaviour sets in at even higher orders. Employing FOPT up to the fifth order to determine $α_s$ in the $\MSb$ scheme, we obtain $α_s(M_τ)=0.320 {}^{+0.012}_{-0.007}$, corresponding to $α_s(M_Z) = 0.1185 {}^{+0.0014}_{-0.0009}$. Improving this result by including yet higher orders from our model yields $α_s(M_τ)=0.316 \pm 0.006$, which after evolution leads to $α_s(M_Z) = 0.1180 \pm 0.0008$. Our results are lower than previous values obtained from $τ$ decays.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑