arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 0709.3099physics.hist-ph
收藏

埃米尔·鲁普、阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦和关于波粒二象性的运河射线实验:科学欺诈和理论偏见

Emil Rupp, Albert Einstein and the canal ray experiments on wave-particle duality: Scientific fraud and theoretical bias

Jeroen van Dongen

摘要:

在1926年埃米尔鲁普发表了一些论文的干涉性质的光发射的渠道射线源。这些文章,特别是与阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦合作的一篇论文,在探索光的波与粒子性质时引起了相当多的关注。他们也极大地推动了鲁普的职业生涯,尽管从一开始他们就备受争议。本文将回顾这一事件,特别是鲁普的合作与爱因斯坦。证据表明,鲁普伪造他的结果,并在社会和政治上分裂的德国物理界的关键接待进行了讨论。这些划分未能解释全部的动态;后者试图转向理论偏见有时在评估实验中的作用。爱因斯坦的反应,特别是在这方面进行了分析。

英文摘要:

In 1926 Emil Rupp published a number of papers on the interference properties of light emitted by canal ray sources. These articles, particularly one paper that came into being in collaboration with Albert Einstein, drew quite some attention as they probed the wave versus particle nature of light. They also significantly propelled Rupp's career, even though that from the outset they were highly controversial. This article will review this episode, and in particular Rupp's collaboration with Einstein. Evidence that Rupp forged his results is presented and their critical reception in the socially and politically divided German physics community is discussed. These divisions fail to explain the full dynamic; the latter is attempted by turning to the role that theoretical bias on occasion has in assessing experiment. Einstein's responses in particular are analyzed in this context.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑