Social consensus is important for society. Sometimes the success of society depends on a consensus (e.g. the decision to pay taxes or to commit to the constitution). Examples for continuous opinion dynamics are discussions about tax rates or budget plan proposals for governments investments. Another example is a commission of experts which should reach a estimate about a certain issue, e.g. the tax revenues of the next year. In all these situations we got a group of agents which should reach a common agreement either for reaching a good approximation to the truth but on the other hand for the reason, that reaching consensus is a good in itself.
From social judgment theory and experiments we know that humans either tend to agreement with others for normative and informational reasons but on the other hand have bounded confidence against others with differing opinions.
In a framework of models of continuous opinion dynamics we ask, which structural conditions foster the achievement of consensus? We present evidence by simulation that bringing more issues in does, but only if the issues are under budget constraints. Further, the installation of meetings where everyone hears all opinions has a better impact than relying on gossip.
Matrix-weighted networks for modeling multidimensional dynamics
Nordita, Stockholm University and KTH Royal Institute of Technology（北欧理论物理研究所、斯德哥尔摩大学及皇家理工学院）；School of Systems Science and Industrial Engineering, Binghamton University（宾汉姆顿大学系统科学与工业工程学院）；Waseda University（早稻田大学）；University of Oxford（牛津大学）
